SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 4063

V.M.VELUMANI
K. A. Nachimuthu – Appellant
Versus
A. Veera Ravi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Sitharanjandas
For the Caveator : Mr. M. Bindran

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order dated 02.12.2015 made in I.A. No. 984 of 2015 in O.S.No.527 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Karur.

2. The petitioner is first defendant in O.S.No.527 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Karur. The first respondent, plaintiff filed the above suit for partition of the suit schedule properties and separate possession and for a direction to the second respondent to render accounts of the suit properties and business from the date of the suit till delivery of the possession.

3. According to the first respondent, all the properties and business are joint family properties. Along with the plaint, first respondent filed I.A.No.984 of 2015 for an appointment of Advocate Commissioner to take inventory of the business conducted in joint family properties and take note of the accounts. According to the first respondent, the petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3 are collecting rental income as well as income from the business. But, they are not furnishing the accounts and giving share to the first respondent.

4. The petitioner filed counter affidavit and opposed the said application and submitted that
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top