P.T.ASHA
Lagrave Jayaseeli – Appellant
Versus
Trinite Modestine (deceased) – Respondent
1. The above Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 909 days, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant, on 13.01.2010 and to bring on record the petitioners as the representatives in interest of the deceased sole appellant Lagrave Jayaseeli. The applications have been filed invoking the provisions of Order XXII Rule 10 C.P.C on the ground that they have purchased portions of the suit property pending the proceedings from the deceased sole appellant.
Contentions of the Petitioners:
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioners would contend that it was only during the 1st week of October 2012, that they had come to know that the above Second Appeal had been dismissed as abated on 29.09.2011. They would also contend that it was only on account of the collusion between the respondents and the deceased appellant that the matter was allowed to be dismissed for default.
3. They would further contend that the deceased appellant had sold the entire suit property to more than hundred persons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.