SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2200

G.JAYACHANDRAN
R. Jacob Pon Paulraj – Appellant
Versus
Jose Jelris – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Subash Babu.

ORDER :

1. The revision petitioner herein is the accused in S.T.C.No.3289 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this revision are that the petitioner herein borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- from the complainant, Jose Jelris and promised to repay the same within a month. To discharge the debt, on 10.05.2006 he issued a post dated cheque bearing No.144606, dated 12.07.2006. On presentaiton of the cheque for collection, it was returned for insufficiency of funds and payment stopped. Statutory notice, dated 21.07.2006 issued by the complainant was received by the petitioner/accused on 22.07.2006. He has not sent reply, inspite of receiving the notice. The Trial Court found him guilty, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for three months and directed to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo one month rigorous imprisonment. Appeal was preferred by him before the learned Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil in C.A.No.75 of 2008. The same was dismissed on 17.02.2018 confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil, in S.T.C.No.3289 of 2006, dated 19.05.2008.

3. Learned c










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top