R.SURESH KUMAR
D. Ramesh S/o Duraisamy – Appellant
Versus
V. Vijayakumar S/o Davidraj – Respondent
1. The facts, which are required to be noticed insofar as Crl. R.C. No. 271/2017 are concerned, read thus:
(i) That the revision petitioner is running a Firm in the name and style of Colour Homes, by which, he constructs houses and sell. He has been doing the said business for several years. During the month of May 2015, since the revision petitioner was in need of some financial assistance to run his business, the accused persons, who are the respondents herein, had contacted the petitioner over phone and they introduced themselves that they are having contact with some big shots, who are the financiers at Overseas and from whom, they will arrange loan to the tune of Rs. 25 Crores to the petitioner.
(ii) In order to strike the deal, the petitioner and the respondents had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 27.05.2015, as per which, the loan would be arranged by the respondents to the petitioner and the petitioner has to pay commission to the respondents. Accordingly, a sum of Rs. 1,10,00,000/- (Rupees one crore ten lakhs only) was demanded as commission in advan
Anilkumar and Others vs. M.K. Aiyappa and Another
Central Bureau of Investigation, Jaipur vs. State of Rajasthan
Devarapalli Lakshminarayana Reddy and Others vs. V. Narayana Reddy and Others
Gopal Das Sindhi and Others vs. State of Assam and Another
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Madhu Bala vs. Suresh Kumar and Others
Mohd. Yousuf vs. Smt. Afaq Jahan and Another
Mona Panwar vs. High Court of Judicature of Allahabad through its Registrar and Others
Priyanka Srivatsava and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.