SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2631

R.SUBRAMANIAN
K. Vidhya – Appellant
Versus
K. Sumithra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Rajasekaran.
For the Respondents: E. Prabu.

JUDGMENT :

R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.

1. The brief history of the litigation between siblings is as follows:-

The suit in C.S. No. 671 of 2009 was filed by the applicant in Application No. 3929 of 2016 seeking partition and separate possession of her half share in the suit property.

According to the plaintiff, in the said suit, the suit property belongs to the mother of the parties, namely, Dr. S. Thavamani. The father of the parties Mr. T.P. Kamalanathan died on 14.11.2007 and the mother Dr. S. Thavamani, died on 05.08.2008 at Chennai intestate leaving behind the parties as their legal representatives.

2. The suit property was allotted to the mother by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and the sale deed came to be executed in her favour by the Board on 09.12.1994. Since dispute arose between the parties after the death of the parents, the suit came to be filed. A compromise was entered into between the parties and the Joint Memo of Compromise was filed on 26.08.2013, which was accepted by this Court.

3. A final decree was passed on 26.08.2013 by this Court based on the said compromise.

"JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT

The plaintiff and the Defendant had amicably settled thei






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top