SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2633

M.V.MURALIDARAN
Venkatasubbu – Appellant
Versus
C. Rajendran Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.M. Hariharan
For the Respondents: Mr. U.M. Ravichandran

JUDGMENT :

This Revision Petition arises out of the Fair and Decretal order dated 01.11.2001 passed in C.R.F.No.16624 of 2001 in A.R.C.No.17/85-86 by the learned Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, the Revision Petitioner herein is the Auction Purchaser.

2. The above Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order of the learned II Additional Sub Court, Coimbatore dated 01.11.2001, rejecting the E.P. in S.R. stage filed by this Revision Petitioner for the delivery of the petition mentioned schedule of property. This Revision Petitioner, who is the auction purchaser of the schedule of property has filed the above E.P. as envisaged under Rule 37(15) of the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The said Act is a self-contained code as the very preamble of the Act indicates.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Civil Revision Petition is that the 1st respondent, who is the Sole Proprietor of the 2nd respondent Firm had availed a loan from the 3rd respondent bank by mortgaging his immovable property (which is the



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top