SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2746

R.SURESH KUMAR
S. Priya – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Prabakaran

ORDER :

R. Suresh Kumar, J.

1. This Criminal Revision Case was filed against the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai in Crl.M.P. No. 13279 of 2017 in Crime No. 220 of 2016, on the file of the Sub Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Team-III, Vepery, Chennai, by order dated 06.09.2017. The revision petitioners against whom, the case was registered by the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 65 & 66 of Information Technology Act and under Sections 408, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477(A) of IPC, had moved petitions for anticipatory bail before this Court in Crl.O.P. Nos. 3611 and 4176 of 2017. The said petitions were dismissed by a learned Judge of this Court by order dated 05.07.2017 where, the learned Judge has traced the facts of the case, which are re-produced hereunder for easy reference:

"The defacto complainant in this case is one Soundarrajan, Company Secretary & Compliance Officer of Sundaram Asset Management Company Limited (hereinafter called as the Company). It is the business of the Company to manage the financial portfolio of their clients, for which the company had appointed four named persons, as authorised signato




















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top