S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Sun Direct TV Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
The writ petitioner filed this writ petition, challenging the notice issued by the respondent dated 30.3.2016 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') in respect of the assessment year 2009-2010 and the consequential order dated 16.12.2016.
2. In this writ petition, the writ petitioner is M/s. Sun Direct TV Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Vice President-Finance/Authorised Signatory.
PLEADINGS OF THE PETITIONER AS WELL AS THE ARGUMENTS:
3. The writ petitioner filed the returns of income for the assessment years 2009-2010 within the prescribed time limit. The returns were selected for compulsory scrutiny under CASS and scrutinised under Section 143(3) of the Act and the assessments were completed in respect of the returns. While-so, the impugned notice has been issued by the respondent in proceedings dated 30.3.2016 under Section 148 of the Act to reopen the assessment years 2009-2010.
4. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the returns filed by the writ petitioner had been assessed under Section 143(1) of the Act and again as a special case under Section 143(3) by way of complete scrutiny of accounts. Under
Biswanath Bhattacharya Vs. Union of India and Others
Calcutta Discount Limited Company Vs. Income Tax Officer, Companies District I, Calcutta
Central Province Manganese Ore Co. Ltd Vs. ITO
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd (now known as Whirlpool of India Ltd.)
Dr. K. Nedunchezhian Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Phool Chand Bajrang Lal Vs. Income-Tax Officer and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.