SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2973

M.DHANDAPANI
R. Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Manokaran, Adv., S. Thankira, Adv.

JUDGMENT

M Dhandapani, J.

This Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 17.09.2018 made in Crl.M.P.No.457 of 2018 in S.C.No.111 of 2018 wherein the lower Court has refused to furnish the documents sought for by the petitioners under Section 207 of Cr.P.C.

2. The case of the petitioners, who were arrayed as A1 to A3, is that one Alena, who is a citizen of Russia, visited the temple at Thiruvannamalai. It is alleged that at that time, some of the accused persons misbehaved with the victim girl, thereby caused injuries on her body.

3. During the course of investigation, the first accused Bharathi was arrested and he gave a confession statement, implicating the accused 2 & 3. Accordingly, they were taken to the police station on 16.07.2018 and after enquiry, they were remanded to judicial custody on 19.07.2018. After investigation, the respondent police has filed a final report on 24.07.2018 and the incomplete copies of the final report were given to the petitioners on 27.07.2018. Thereafter, the petitioners have filed a petition under Section 207 Cr.P.C., to furnish nine relied upon documents. Even though the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1 has furnished eight documents, ex






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top