1. This Revision Petition arises struck off the plaint in O.S. No. 155 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned II Additional District Munsif at Tiruchirapalli, wherein the Revision Petitioners are the defendants in the above suit.

2. The above Civil Revision Petition is filed to struck off the plaint in O.S. No. 155 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned II Additional District Munsif at Tiruchirapalli as the same does not have cause of action and also abuse of process of the Court. The defendants in the above suit are the revision petitioners herein and the plaintiff is the respondent.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Civil Revision Petition are as follows:

The brief facts of the case according to these Revision Petitioners:

The larger extent of lands measuring 4 Acres and 44 Cents comprised in Survey Nos. 6/1, 6/3 and 6/4 and 7/2, 7/3 and 7/4 situated in K. Sathanur Village, Tiruchirapalli District was originally belonged to late Perumal Naidu. During his lifetime, he bequeathed the said property by way of a Will dated 11.06.1970 to and in favour of his adopted son namely Mr. Muthukrishnan. Later he died on 31.10.1974. Thereafter, being the other grandchildren of Perumal Naidu, namely Mr. Govindarajan, Mrs. Ethirajammal and Mrs. Soundaram have released their entire claim over the said property on 25.10.1988 to and in favour of the above said Mr. Muthukrishnan who in turn settled the said property to his son namely Mr. M. Prathap and his wife Mrs. Muthulakshmi.

4. Later, after settling some disputes in respect of the said properties, the above said Mr. M. Prathap the respondent herein had sold the larger extent of lands comprised in Survey Nos. 6/1, 6/3 and 6/4 situated in K. Sathanur Village, Tiruchirapalli District to these revision petitioners under a Sale Deed dated 11.12.2009 registered as pending Document No. 98/2009 in the S.R.O., K. Sathanur, Trichy District. Similarly, the above said Mrs. Muthulakshmi had also sold the lands in Survey Nos. 7/2, 7/3 and 7/4 to these revision petitioners under a Sale Deed dated 11.12.2009, registered as pending Document No. 99/2009 in the S.R.O., K. Sathanur, Trichy District. Thereafter the petitioners having taken possession of the said properties by putting up a watchman shed, compound wall and also electricity connection.

5. While so, on 27.07.2012 the Sub Registrar of K. Sathanur passed an erroneous order by refusing to register the sale deeds in pending document bearing Nos.98 and 99 of 2009 leading to filing of an Appeal before the District Registrar and in view of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No. 9357 of 2014 dated 04.08.2014, the said Appeal before the District Registrar was entertained and kept pending. Meanwhile, one Suraya Begam lodged a complaint against the petitioners with the Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Trichy. The said complaint was registered under Crime No. 23 of 2012 leading to obtaining an order of Anticipatory Bail by the petitioners. Meanwhile, Mr. J. Govindarajan and B. Ethirajammal, through their General Power of Attorney Agent namely Mr. Solomon Devaraj has filed a Civil Suit in O.S. No. 680 of 2010 before the learned District Munsif Court at Tiruchirapalli against these revision petitioners and Others.

6. After executing the above said sale deeds to and in favour of the petitioners, the above named Govindarajan, Ethirajammal, Soundarammal, Muthukrishnan, M. Prathap, Senthilkumar and Meenavathi conspired with one Mr. Solomon Devaraj in grabbing the said properties by way of unlawful means. By such conspiracy through the said Solomon Devaraj, they obtained a compromise decree in O.S. Nos. 634 of 2010, 49 of 2010 and 470 of 2010 before the learned District Munsif Court at Tiruchirapalli, thereby the said Solomon Devaraj had also lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Trichy against the petitioners. The Inspector of Police in turn by calling for the report sent both the complaint