SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3612

S.MANIKUMAR, P.T.ASHA
Varaaki – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By Secretary Ministry of Law – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C. Chokkalingam, Adv.

JUDGMENT

S. Manikumar, J.

Claiming himself to be an editor of a magazine, Indian Reporter and Founder and President of the Indian Makkal Mandram, a forum for readers of Indian Reporter, petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the Registrar General, High Court, Madras, Chennai, to frame regulations, rule or scheme, for presenting and registration/filing of the public interest writ petitions and also withdrawing the same, before this Court.

2. When this Bench posed a question, as to whether the petitioner has made any averments, regarding framing of regulations, relating to public interest writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by the High Court and the Notification issued, Mr. Chockalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner replied that the petitioner has not made any averments.

3. Grievance of the petitioner is that certain public interest writ petitions have been filed by political personalities and being withdrawn, thereby the precious time of the High Court is wasted by the writ petitioners and consequently, there is a delay in justice being rendered to other people.

4. Paragraph Nos.5, 6 and 7, reasons assigned by the petitioner, for f














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top