SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3649

N.ANAND VENKATESH
S. A. Margaret Angel – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Samidurai, Adv., M. Chandra Sekaran, Adv.

JUDGMENT

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.48 of 2016, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai.

2. The petitioners are arrayed as A-1 and A-2 in the final report.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner was married to one Gerald Raja in the year 2008 and out of the said wedlock, a female child was also born to them. It is the further case of the prosecution that even before the first petitioner married the said Gerald Raja, she had an affair with one Rajesh, who was arrayed as A-3 in the final report. This was questioned by the deceased husband of the first petitioner and on 19.03.2014, the first petitioner went missing and the deceased lodged a complaint before the respondent police. On 23.03.2014, the second petitioner is said to have contacted the deceased over phone and abused him stating that he should not have married the first petitioner and he is incapable of supporting his wife/first petitioner and the first petitioner will live only with the said Rajesh and the deceased should not go in search of the first petitioner and rather he can go and die. The first petitione





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top