SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4001

M.V.MURALIDARAN
S. R. David – Appellant
Versus
D. Sreedhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Shivasurya
For the Respondent: N. Manokaran

JUDGMENT :

1. This Appeal is directed against the Judgment of acquittal passed in C.A.No.86 of 2011 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No. III, Coimbatore, dated 17.09.2011 reversing the Judgment of Conviction sentencing the respondent to undergo simple imprisonment of 1 year and fine Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo 3 months imprisonment vide the order dated 04.01.2011 in C.C.No.141 of 2008.

2. The sum and substance of this Appeal as follows :

It is the case of appellant S.R. David that the respondent D.Sridhar borrowed a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- on 15.07.2007 from him. It was agreed by him to repay the said amount within two months from date of borrow. However, the respondent failed to keep up his promise.

3. When the complainant/appellant demanded the above amount, the respondent issued a Cheque bearing No.245839 dated 08.01.2008 drawn on ING Viyasa Bank towards his liability. Accordingly as per respondent’s instruction the cheque was presented for encashment. However the cheque remained dishonored with an endorsement account closed. Thereupon a legal notice was issued to the respondent calling upon him to repay the amount. Even then as there was




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top