G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
MUTHOOT FINANCE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DAVIDSON THARMARAJ – Respondent
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
1. This quash petition is filed to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.110 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, having been taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 410, 419, 406, 409 and 120-(B) of I.P.C. as against the petitioners and others on the private complaint filed by the respondent.
2. The case of the complainant/respondent is that on 12.01.2004, he pledged few articles of gold weighing about 78 grams for a sum of Rs.48,000/- . Again, on 27.01.2004, he pledged gold jewels and other golden articles weighing about 118 grams for a sum of Rs.52,000/-. Further, on 03.01.2004, he pledged gold jewels along with other articles weighing 44 grams for a sum of Rs.18,000/- and also on 09.02.2004, again he pledged his gold jewels weighing about 55 grams for a sum of Rs.24,000/-. For all the pledges, the accused issued pawn tickets. Thereafter, the complainant approached the accused for redemption of jewels. However, he was informed that the jewels, which he pledged with the accused, were auctioned for non payment of the interest as well as the principal within a time stipulated by the accused. The complainant also came to un
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma Vs. State of Bihar
Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) 6 SCC 736
Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka Vs. M/s. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners (2009) 6 SCALE 162
State of Karnataka Vs. Pastor P. Raju (2006) 6 SCC 728
V.Y. Jose Vs. State of Gujarat
Veer Prakash Sharma Vs. Anil Kumar Agarwal (2007) 9 SCALE 502
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.