M.VENUGOPAL, R.PONGIAPPAN
Raja Garden Residence Owners Welfare Association – Appellant
Versus
Member Secretary CMDA – Respondent
M.VENUGOPAL, J.
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Learned Counsel for the 1st Respondent/CMDA, the Learned Counsel for the Respondents 2 and 3 and the Learned Counsel for the 4th Respondent.
2. According to the Petitioner/Association, it is registered in 2014 for the Welfare of the inmates which consists of more than 30 Residential Houses. As a matter of fact, the Association is established for the Welfare of the owners of residents.
3. The stand of the Petitioner is that the 4th Respondent with the help of her husband by name Venkatesan @ Peravallur Venkatesan had illegally constructed a Kalyana Mandapam in the name of Shri Venkateshwara Mahal on the land belonging to the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board without any title or right including the Paper Mills Road and utilised 10 feet in 20 feet road in the Raja Garden Welfare Association including third party property and that the said Kalyana Mandapam was constructed without any strong basement.
4. It is represented on behalf of the Petitioner that the 4th Respondent belonging to a Member of a Political party had indulged in illegal activities by encroaching the Government land and constructed the Kalyana Mandapam
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority V. Abdur Rahman, Hotel Nest International, Chennai
Hajee Moosa Sulaiman Sait and others V. State of Tamil Nadu
Madras Race Club V. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Nalini Chidambaram V. State of Tamil Nadu
R.Antony Doss V. The State of Tamil Nadu
S.Ravi V. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Madras and others
State of West Bengal V. Terra Firma Investment and Trading (P) Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.