M.VENUGOPAL, P.RAJAMANICKAM
Union of India, Rep. by the Director General, Department of Posts, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
K. Ragothaman – Respondent
M. VENUGOPAL, J.
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the 2nd Respondent in connection with the order passed in O.A.No.458 of 2015 vide order dated 06.07.2016 and quash the same.)
1. The Petitioners have filed the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal pertaining to the order passed in O.A.No.458 of 2015 dated 06.07.2016.
2. Earlier, the 2nd Respondent/Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, while passing orders in Original Application No.310/00458 of 2015 [filed by the 1st Respondent/Applicant], at paragraphs 9 and 10, had observed the following:
“9. Be that as it may, the fact that the applicant was appointed on adhoc basis as Group D on 26.6.2000 against the 'vacancies for the year 2000' and continued as Group D employee on adhoc basis till 21.03.2002 cannot be disputed as it is a matter of record. It is admitted that in terms of Rule 49 of the CC
State of W.B. and others V. Aghore Nath Dey and others
Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Sharma v. State of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar and others V. State of Bihar and Others
S.P.Vasudeva V. State of Haryana
State of Rajesthan V. Jagdish Narain Chaturvedi
J & K Public Service Commission V. Dr.Narinder Mohan
State of Haryana and others V. Shakuntla Devi
Director, Institute of Management Development, U.P. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Srivastava
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.