S.MANIKUMAR, M.VENUGOPAL
V. Sridevi – Appellant
Versus
C. S. Mani – Respondent
S. MANIKUMAR, J.
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the order passed by the IIIrd Additional Family Court at Chennai in I.A.No.3648 of 2011 in O.P.No.3499 of 2009, dated 20.07.2015.)
1. Aggrieved by order dated 20.07.2015 made in I.A.No.3648 of 2011 in O.P.No.3499 of 2009, on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, the present appeal has been filed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as father and mother.
3. Facts leading to the appeal are as follows:
Marriage between the parties was solemnised on 23.06.2000, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs and it was registered in the Office of the Registrar, Erode. Out of the wedlock, a male child was born. Differences of opinion arose between them and they lived separately from 26.09.2004. Hence, finding that there is no chance of reunion, the Family Court in F.C.O.P.No.3499 of 2009, dated 10.11.2009, has granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent. Custody of the child was given to the appellant-mother. Visitation rights were given to the respondent-father, as follows:
“The first petitioner (mother) shall have the custody of male chi
Anjali Kapoor v. Rajiv Baijal reported in 2009 (7) SCC 322
Athar Hussain v. Syed Siraj Ahmed
Dhanwanti Joshi v. Madhav Unde
Dr.Nithya Vidyaprakash v. B.Suresh Babu reported in 2010 (5) MLJ 805
Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw
Gaytri Bajaj v. Jiten Bhalla reported in 2012 (12) SCC 471
Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal
Kumar v. Jahgirdar v. Chethana Ramatheertha reported in 2004 (2) SCC 688
Mausami Moitra Ganguli v. Jayant Ganguli reported in 2008 (7) SCC 673
Muthuswami Chettiar v. K.M. Chinna Muthuswami Moopanar
Rosy Jacob Vs. Jacob A. Chakramakkal
R.V. Srinath Prasad v. Nandamuri Jayakrishna
Sheila B. Das v. P.R.Sugasree reported in 2006 (3) SCC 62
Samuel Stephen Richard v. Stella Richard
S. Soora Reddi v. S. Chenna Reddi
Sumedha Nagpal v. State of Delhi
Thrity Hoshie Dolikuka v. Hoshiam Shavaksha Dolikuka
Vikram Vir Vohra v. Shalini Bhalla reported in 2010 (4) SCC 409
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.