SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 712

T.RAVINDRAN
Rajagopal Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Sakunthala Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Rajarajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree of the Principal Subordinate Judges Court, Thiruvannamalai passed in A.S.No.67 of 1999 dated 29.09.2001 confirming the decree and judgment of the District Munsif's Court, Thiruvannamalai passed in O.S.No.519 of 1998 dated 15.06.1999.)

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2001 passed in A.S.No.67 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thiruvannamalai confirming the judgment decree and dated 15.06.1999 passed in O.S.No.519 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The parties are referred to as per the rankings in the trial court for the sake of convenience.

3. Suit for declaration, mense profits, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that the plaint A schedule properties originally belonged to Dhanalakshmi ammal, the sister of the plaintiff's father Natesa Gounder by virtue of the settlement deed dated 24.08.1962 executed in her favour by her father and following the same, it is only Dhanalakshmi ammal, who has been in the possession and enjoyment of


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top