K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. , Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Larger Taxpayer Unit-1, Nungambakkam – Respondent
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records pertaining to F No. Recovery / DCIT (LTU) - 1 / 2017-18, dated 22.03.2018 on the file of the respondent herein and quash the same.)
Assailing the order of the respondent dated 22.03.2018, whereby the petitioner was directed to remit tax at 15% of the total payment of Rs.19415,62,77,269/- along with interest under Section 115P of the Income Tax Act (in short "Act"), the present Writ Petition has been filed.
2. According to the petitioner, it is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of development of computer software and related services and export. In the year 2013, the petitioner bought back its own shares under Section 77A of the Companies Act. Thereafter, during the year 2016 under the Scheme of Arrangement and Compromise, the petitioner planned to purchase its own shares under Sections 391 to 393 of the Companies Act for the following reasons:-
(i) to increase earnings per share and return
Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1986) 27 Taxman 275 (SC)
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Angadi Bros. (1985) 22 Taxman 578 (Karnataka)
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindusthan Steel Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kanpur Coal Syndicate (1964) 53 ITR 225 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.