SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1181

N.SATHISH KUMAR
3i Infotech Limited, Navi Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
P. Balasubramanian – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. Anirudh Krishnan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M/s. K.S. Sundar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: The Original Petition has been filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to set aside the award dated 10.06.2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal insofar as it is against the petitioner, reject the claims of the Respondents and allow the counter claim of the petitioner and alternatively remit the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal to decide the issue in accordance with the findings of this Court with costs.)

1. This Original Petition has been filed by the Claimant to set aside the award dated 10.06.2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal insofar as it is against the petitioner, reject the claims of the Respondents and allow the counter claim of the petitioner and alternatively remit the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal to decide the issue in accordance with the findings of this Court. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred as per their own rankings before the Arbitral Proceedings.

2. The brief facts of the claimant's case is as follows:

2(a) The claimants are the co-owners of the four office units situated at 7th Floor of the building















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top