SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 793

J.R.MIDHA
HS Bedi – Appellant
Versus
National Highway Authority of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Vikas Tiwari, Sankalp Goswami, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Sumit Gupta, Advocate.

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, there is no indication that the judgement has been overruled or that an appeal has been filed or is pending. The document concludes with the dismissal of the appeal with costs and the order to release the bank guarantee and decretal amount, as well as a direction to issue a show cause notice for making a false claim. There is no mention of any further legal proceedings such as a stay, appeal, or overruling of the judgement. Therefore, it can be inferred that this judgement has not been overruled or appealed as per the information provided.


Judgment :-

1. The appellant has challenged the judgment and decree for Rs.8,93,892/- along with interest thereon @ 9% per annum passed by the learned Additional District Judge in favour of the respondent and against the appellant.

2. The appellant was the landlord and the respondent was the tenant of the property bearing no. B-529, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. For the sake of convenience, the appellant and the respondent are referred to as the “landlord” and “tenant” respectively.

3. Relevant facts

3.1. Vide registered lease deed dated 27th April, 1998, the landlord leased out property bearing No.B-529, New Friends Colony, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “suit property”) to the tenant for a period of three years with effect from 15th April, 1998 upto 14th April, 2001 at the monthly rent of Rs.1,85,000/- for the first two years and Rs.2,03,500/- for the third year. The tenant paid security deposit of Rs.12,21,000/- to the landlord refundable at the time of handing over of possession of the suit property.

3.2. On 26th March, 2001, the parties extended the lease upto 30th June, 2001. The terms of this extension are recorded in tenant’s letter dated 26th March, 2001, relevant














































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top