P.JYOTHIMANI
P. N. Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, I Additional Labour Court – Respondent
P. Jyothimani, J.
The writ petition is filed by the Petitioner/employee against the common award passed by the I Additional Labour Court, Chennai in I.D. No. 556/1993 insofar as it relates to the claim of the Petitioner for computation of benefits to which he in entitled as per the terms of General Office Orders of EID Parry (India) Limited, the second Respondent.
2. The second Respondent is engaged in the manufacture and sale of sugar, fertilizer pesticides, chemicals, ceramics, etc. having branches all over India. The Petitioner joined as a Clerk on June 1, 1962 and having worked in various branches, he lastly worked as Clerk in Farm Inputs Division, Dare House, Chennai. He became a member of EID Staff Association, which is a registered Union and he worked as an Executive Committee Member.
(a) Under the General office Orders issued by the second Respondent, as per Clause 26, the employees are entitled for full pension, if they complete 30 years of service and in case where an employee has put in more than 20 years of service, he is entitled to proportionate pension.
(b) The dispute regarding payment of pension with the second Respondent was ultimately settled by the Hon'ble Su
EID Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. M.N. Padmanabhan and Another
Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Syed Ahmad Ishaque and Others
Parry and Co. Ltd. Vs. P.C. Pal and Others
Ramniklal N. Bhutta and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Shama Prashant Raje Vs. Ganpatrao and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.