M.SUNDAR
Tvl. M. K. Gopi (Civil works Contractor), S-1, Iswarya Jayam, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (ST), Royapuram Assessment Circle, Chennai – Respondent
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in respect of the Order No.TIN 33831282169/2008-09/dt.20.06.2018 passed by the respondent, quash the same and further direct the respondent to pass order afresh.)
1. This common order will dispose of these seven writ petitions. In other words, this common order will given all the aforementioned seven writ petitions.
2. Mr.Manoharan Sundaram, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for the writ petitioner and Ms.Dhanamadhri, learned Government Advocate (Taxes) on behalf of sole respondent are before this Court.
3. Though this matter is listed under the caption ‘ADJOURNED ADMISSION’, by consent of both the learned counsel i.e., counsel for writ petitioner and revenue counsel, these main writ petitions itself are taken up for final disposal, same are heard out and are being disposed of.
4. The subject matter of these writ petitions are common. Seven different proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Royapuram Assessment Circle i.e., sole respondent in these writ petitions, have been called in question in each of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.