SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1427

T.RAVINDRAN
S. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
A. R. Venkidusamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :N. Manokaran, Advocate
For the Respondents:V. Raghavachari, V. Raghavachari, P.Valliappan, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer in S.A.No.935 of 2005: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2005 made in A.S.No.74 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2003 made in O.S.No.229 of 2001 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.

Prayer in S.A.No.938 of 2005: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2005 made in A.S.No.82 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.10.2003 made in O.S.No.64 of 2001 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.

Prayer in S.A.No.939 of 2005: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2005 made in A.S.No.83 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.10.2003 made in O.S.No.87 of 2001 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.)

1. In these matters, the three wills said to have been executed by A.M. Rangasamy Gounder dated 04.06.1999, 15.02.2000, 29.08.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top