BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. VAIDYANATHAN, N. ANAND VENKATESH, JJ.
Sivasankaran & Others – Appellants
Versus
State represented by the Inspector of Police, Nainarkovil Police Station, Ramanathapuram – Respondents
Crl.A(MD)Nos. 425 to 428 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.(MD).No. 9809 of 2018
Decided on : 03-10-2019
Indian Penal Code-Section 147, 148, 307,302, 324 etc-The maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus (false in one thing, false in every thing) is neither a sound rule of law nor a rule of practice. Hardly one comes across a witness whose evidence does not contain a grain of untruth or at any rate exaggerations, embroideries or embellishments. It is, therefore, the duty of the court to scrutinise the evidence carefully and, in terms of the felicitous metaphor, separate the grain from the chaff.
Statement of facts:
Previous enmity between the parties in construction of a Mariamman temple at Government poramboke land at Siruvayal Nadukkudiyiruppu Village. On 23.12.2009, at about 06.00 p.m., at Aranmanai Bus Stand, A12 is said to have instigated A1 and A8 to kill the deceased Murugesan. Pursuant to the said instigation, A1, A2, A8, A9, A10 and A11 are said to have joined together as an unlawful assembly with deadly weapons and they were also joined by A3 to A7 and at 7.00 p.m., on the southern side of the bus stop of Siruvayal Nadukkudiyiruppu, when P.W.1, the deceased Murugesan, P.W.4, P.W.5, P.W.6, P.W.7 and P.W.8 were catching fish, they were attacked
Finding of the court:
A1, A2, A9 and A10 are acquitted from the charges under Sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC. The sentence imposed against these accused persons shall run concurrently and the period already undergone by the accused/appellants shall be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C.-The bail bonds executed by A3 to A7, who are the appellants in Crl.A.(MD).No.427 of 2017 shall stand cancelled and the fine amount, if any, paid by them shall be refunded to them-A2, who is the appellant in Crl.A.(MD).Nos.426/2017 and A9 & A10, who are the appellants in Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2017 shall surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi forthwith- The bail bond executed by them shall stand cancelled.
Result: Crl.A.(MD).Nos. 425, 426 and 428 of 2017 are partly allowed
Crl.A.(MD).No.427 of 2017 is allowed
JUDGMENT :
S. Vaidyanathan, J. & N. Anand Venkatesh, J.
(Common Prayer: Appeals are filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 31.08.2017, passed in S.C.No.3 of 2011 by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Paramakudi, and to acquit the accused/appellants from all the charges.)
1. The appellants, who were ranked as A1 to A10 before the trial Court have filed this Criminal Appeal against the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge (FTC), Paramakudi, dated 31.08.2017, made in S.C.No.3 of 2011, wherein the accused persons have been convicted and sentenced as follows:
| Sl.No. | Rank of the accused | Offence for which convicted | Sentence of imprisonment | Fine amount |
| 1. | A1 | Under Section 147 IPC | 1 year Simple Imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | 3 years Simple Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment. | ||
| Under Section 307 IPC | 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.3000/-, in default, to undergo 1 year Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 IPC | Life imprisonment | Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| 2. | A2 | Under Section 147 IPC | One year simple imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | Life Imprisonment | Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| 3. | A3 to A7 | Under Section 147 IPC | One year Simple Imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | Life Imprisonment | Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| 4. | A8 | Under Section 147 IPC | One year Simple Imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 324 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | Life Imprisonment | Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| 5. | A9 | Under Section 147 IPC | One year Simple Imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 324 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 326 IPC | Five years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.3000/-, in default, to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | Life Imprisonment | Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| 6. | A10 | Under Section 147 IPC | One year Simple Imprisonment | Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment |
| Under Section 148 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 324 IPC | Three years Rigorous Imprisonment | Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment | ||
| Under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC | L |
Akbar Sheikh and others vs. State of West Bengal
Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra
Balaka Singh v. State of Punjab
Balaka Singh and Ors. v. The State of Punjab [1975 (4) SCC 511].
Baladin & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh [AIR 1956 SC 181]
Gubbala Venugopalswamy v. State of Andhra Pradesh [2004 (10) SCC 120]
Gurucharan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab [AIR 1956 SC 460]
Jayaseelan v. State of Tamil Nadu
Jakki @ Selvaraj & Anr. v. State represented by the IP, Coimbatore
Krishna Mochi and Ors. v. State of Bihar etc. [2002 (6) SCC 81]
Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Musa Khan and Others v. State of Maharashtra [(1977) 1 SCC 733]
Maranadu and Anr. v. State By Inspector of Police
Mani @ Udattu Man & Ors. v. State represented by Inspector of Police
Munna Chanda v. State of Assam [(2006) 3 SCC 752]
Nisar Alli v. The State of Uttar Pradesh [AIR 1957 SC 366
Nagarjit Ahir v. State of Bihar [(2005) 10 SCC 369]
Prem Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ram Udgar Singh v. State of Bihar [2004(10) SCC 443]
State of U.P. v. Dan Singh and Ors. [(1997) 3 SCC 747]
Sohrab s/o Beli Nayata and Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1972 (3) SCC 751]
Sherey and Others v. State of U.P. 1991 Supp2 SCC 437
Syed Ibrahim vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Sucha Singh v. State of Punjab [2003 (7) SCC 643]
State of Rajasthan v. Smt Kalki and Anr. [1981 (2) SCC 752]
Shankaraya Naik & Ors. v. State of Karnataka [2008 (12) SCALE 742]
Ugar Ahir and Ors. v. The State of Bihar [AIR 1965 SC 277]
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.