M.M.SUNDRESH, C.SARAVANAN
Deep Jyothi Projects Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. Rukumani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Saravanan, J.
1. By this common order following two appeals are being disposed:-
ii. A.S. No. 294 of 2017 has been filed by the 2nd and the 5th defendants in the above suit. They are the father and son.
2. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree, the above appeals have been filed by the respective appellants. They have prayed for setting aside the impugned preliminary decree passed by the Trial Court holding that the plaintiffs were entitled 2/5th shares each in the suit schedule property.
3. For the sake of narration of facts, the ranks given to the parties in O.S. No. 623 of 2009 are referred in this appeal.
4. By the impugned judgment and decree, the Trial Court has passed a preliminary degree as prayed for by the plaintiffs (respondents No. 1 and 2 in the respective appeals).
5. The appellant in A.S. No. 266 of 2017 is the 12th respondent in A.S. No.
Baljinder Singh v. Ratan Singh (2008) 16 SCC 785 : LNIND 2008 SC 1583
Dwarampudi Nagaratnamba Kunuku Ramayya [(1968) 1 SCR 43 : AIR 1968 SC 253]
Mukund Singh v. Wazir Singh [(1972) 4 SCC 178]
Pavithri Devi v. Darbari Singh and Another (1993) 4 SCC 392
Thamma Venkata Subbamma v. Thamma Rattamma AIR 1987 SC 1775 : (1987) 3 SCC 294 : LNIND 1987 SC 463
Thamma Venkata subbamma v. Thamma Rattamma [(1987) 3 SCC 294 : AIR 1987 SC 1775]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.