Murugan vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2313

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :G. Karuppasamy Pandian, P.T. Ramesh Raja, Advocates.
For the Respondent: S. Chandrasekar, Addl. Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

S. VAIDYANATHAN, N. ANAND VENKATESH, JJ.

Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records and set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.4 of 2009 dated 31.102017 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Court (Communal Clash Cases Court), Madurai and allow this appeal and acquit the Appellants / Accused from the charge leveled against them.

1. The Appellants / A1 to A3 have filed this Criminal Appeal against the judgment of the learned District and Sessions Court (Communal Clash Cases Court), Madurai made in S.C.No.4 of 2009, dated 31.10.2017, convicting and sentencing the Appellants as follows:

Sl.No.	Rank of the Accused	Offences for which convicted	Sentence of imprisonment	Fine amount
1.	A1	Section 452 of IPC	Seven Years Rigorous Imprisonment	Rs.5,000/-in default to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment
		Section 302 of IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-in default to undergo three years Rigorous Imprisonment
		Section 506(ii) of IPC	Four Years R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2313

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESHMurugan – AppellantVersusState Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District – Respondent