SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 2481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JJ.
Sivakumar & Others – Petitioners
Versus
Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. Nos. 10415 of 2019 & 34578 of 2018 & W.M.P. Nos. 10942, 10944, 3563, 3574, & 3576 of 2019 & 40103, 40107 & 40109 of 2018
Decided On : 27-09-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Satish Parasaran, Senior Counsel R. Parthasarathy, T. Mohan for M/s. Nivedita Simenan, Advocates.
For the Respondent:A. Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Jayesh B. Dolia, Vijay Narayan, Advocate General assisted by V. Shanmuga Sundaram, Special Government Pleader, P.S. Ganesh, V.C. Selvasekaran, T.K. Bhaskar, N. Ramesh, Senior Panel Counsel, Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate, S.V. Vijay Prashanth, Additional Government Pleader (Forests), P.S. Ganesh, Vijay Narayan, Advocate General assisted by M/s. Jayesh B. Dolia, T.K. Bhaskaran, Advocates.

Headnote:

Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978 - Section 18 - Town and Country Planning Act - Section 113 - Regulation 20 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Challenge in writ petition is for a writ of mandamus forbearing Metro Rail Limited Metropolitan Development Authority Commissioner Greater Corporation from encroaching upon or proceeding with the construction of work at towards development of amenities centre/mall and for a consequential direction to the respondents, to take necessary steps, to restore as it existed prior to the handing over of possession to the Chennai Metro Rail Limited - Petitioners are the residents - It is stated in writ petition that was established as a part of a residential colony, which was founded in the year - Park is one of the oldest parks in City - It functions as a crucial lung space and provides green cover park is spread over a substantial area of around 9 acres and has a great number of deep-rooted trees - Held, No doubt it is well settled and it cannot be debated that trees cannot be sacrificed and that there cannot be indiscriminatory cut in the name of development - Government have to ensure proper plantation of saplings - They have undertaken that they will plant about varieties of trees/plants as mentioned supra - This Court has to balance between need to provide adequate parking in city on one hand and cutting of trees which is detriment to ecology on other hand – Court therefore direct the Government to ensure that the undertaking regarding planting of trees is implemented to ensure that tree cover which is being lost for time being would again come back - Court also direct noise pollution level in area during the construction is within reasonable and permissible limits so as to cause least inconvenience to residents of the area - Writ petitions are dismissed.

ORDER :

Subramonium Prasad, J.

(Prayer in W.P.No.34578 of 2018: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their agents or any persons acting under them, from encroaching upon or proceeding with construction work at Thiru.Vi.Ka.Park, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai, towards development of amenities center/mall and a consequential direction to the respondents to take necessary steps to restore Thiru.vi.ka.Park, as it existed prior to the handing over of possession to the first respondent.

W.P.No.10415 of 2019: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the third respondent in G.O.(MS).No.70, dated 31/5/2018, quash the same and consequently, direct the appropriate official respondents to restore Thiru.Vi.Ka.Park, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai, as it existed prior to handing over possession to the eighth respondent.)

1. Challenge in writ petition No.34578 of 2018, is for a writ of mandamus, forbearing Chennai Metro Rail Limited; Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority; Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, from encroaching upon or proceeding with the construction of work, at Thiru.Vi.Ka.Park, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai, towards development of amenities centre/mall and for a consequential direction to the respondents, to take necessary steps, to restore Thiru.Vi.Ka.Park as it existed prior to the handing over of possession to the Chennai Metro Rail Limited.

2. Petitioners in W.P.No.34578 of 2018, are the residents of Shenoy Nagar. It is stated in the writ petition that Thiru.vi.Ka.Park was established as a part of Shenoy Nagar, a residential colony, which was founded in the year 1951-52. The park is one of the oldest parks in the City. It functions as a crucial lung space and provides green cover for Chennai. The park is spread over a substantial area of around 9 acres and has a great number of deep-rooted trees. The deep rooted trees in the park make it an essential catchment area for rains, thereby, alleviating water shortages and sustaining the ground water levels in the area. The park had over 300 trees, most of which were several decades old. The said park has been demarcated as an Open Space and Recreational use Zone, in the Master Plan for Chennai Metropolitan Area, 2026.

3. Shenoy Nagar had never seen any flooding, before Chennai Metro Rail Limited took over, even during heavy rainfall. This has been mainly due to the natural draining and absorption of rain water in the park area. The same also improves the groundwater table in the area. The park also provides a home for a large variety of birds, which was a sight otherwise unseen in an urban metropolis such as Chennai. The protection of the few remaining habitats for such creatures within the City is a crucial integer in ensuring the protection of whatever fragile ecosystem remains in Chennai.

4. It was proposed to introduce metro rail in Chennai. Shenoy Nagar fell in the first route that was to be introduced as part of the metro rail. Chennai Metro Rail Limited, proposed a plan, in August 2008 and construction was commenced in the year 2011. The metro line was to be built as an underground construction below the park. The metro station was to be constructed on the park. It is also stated that prior to the commencement of the construction of metro station, the park provided a space to conduct recreational activities and a number of facilities, including a jogging track, children’s play area, reading and meditation zones, and provided a home for a variety of birds. It is further stated in the writ petition that a number of trees in the park were cut down for metro station work, when the station was constructed. After the construction of metro station, petitioners expected that the park woul


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top