N.SATHISH KUMAR
K. Dhanasekar Engineering Contractor – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep. by its General Manager Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to set aside the Award dated 23.05.2014 passed by Respondents 3 to 5.
Challenging the Three Members Arbitral Award, the present Original Petition has been filed.
2. The brief facts leading to file this O.P. is as follows:
2(b) It is the case of the claimant that work was not completed in time. However, contract was terminated. It is not as per general condition of contract. It is his further case that thereafter risk tenders were awarded on relaxed specification of 25% impact value at exorbitant rate. Despite his plea for relaxing the impact value to 25% was not considered by the Respondent. It is the plea of relaxation of impact value had been consider
Harji Engg.Works Pvt. Ltd., vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. & Another
Union of India and others vs. Tantia Constructions Private Limited
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., v. Saw Pipes Ltd.
Mc-Dermott International Inc., v. Burn Standard Co.,Ltd.
Puravankara Projects Limited v. Mrs. Ranjani Venkatraman Ganesh and Another
Associate Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authority reported in (2015) 3 SCC 49
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.