SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 171

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Rathnavelu – Appellant
Versus
S. Lakshmi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Chitra Sampath, Senior Counsel, R. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Gururaj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2005 made in A.S.No.15 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore, reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2004 made in O.S.No.135 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Cuddalore.)

1. This second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2005 made in A.S.No.15 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore, reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2004 made in O.S.No.135 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Cuddalore.

2.  For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff in brief is as follows:-

3.1. The suit is filed for declaration, recovery of possession and also for means profit. The suit property is a vacant site with an incomplete house, which was purchased by the plaintiff by a registered sale deed dated 03.06.1991 for the sale consideration of Rs.31,500/- from the defendant. Since the construction was incomplete, the property was mentioned as vacant site and the sale

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top