SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 318

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
R.S. Bharathi (M/A - 73 years) & Others - Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner Office Building, Chennai & Another - Respondent
Crl.O.P. Nos. 7929 & 7930 of 2020 & Crl.M.P. No. 4009 of 2020 & Crl.A. No. 234 of 2020
Decided On : 30-05-2020

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:R. Shanmugasundaram, N.R. Elango, A. Ramesh, Senior Counsels, E. Raj Thilak, A. Natarajan, State Public Prosecutor assisted by S. Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor, G.R. Hari, Advocates.

The specific provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and the discretion of the lower court in granting interim bail were central to the judgment.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(u) and 3(1)(v) - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the offenses under Section 3(1)(u) and 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the mandatory requirements of giving notice to the defacto complainant under Section 15-A(5) of the Act. The court also considered the specific provision for filing an appeal against the order of the lower court under Section 14-A of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The accused made disrespectful remarks against members of the oppressed class, leading to the registration of a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The accused sought bail, which was granted by the lower court, leading to multiple petitions and appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the lower court's grant of interim bail was justified considering the prevailing COVID-19 situation and the accused's family members being doctors treating COVID-19 patients. The court also dismissed the petition challenging the bail order, citing the specific provision for filing an appeal under the Act.

Issues: The issues involved the grant of interim bail, compliance with mandatory notice requirements, and the jurisdiction for filing appeals against the lower court's order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the specific provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the prevailing COVID-19 situation, and the discretion of the lower court in granting interim bail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the lower court to consider the bail application of the petitioner. The petition challenging the bail order was dismissed, and the criminal appeal was also dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.7929 of 2020: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying, to direct the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai to consider the Bail Application of the Petitioner on the same day after the Petitioner’s surrender in Crime No. 119 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, E-3 Teynampet Police Station, Chennai.

Crl.O.P.No.7930 of 2020: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying, to set aside the part of the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge in granting interim bail to the respondent in Crl.M.P.No.(Not Assigned) of 2020 dated 23.05.2020 pending disposal of the set aside petition.

Crl.A.No.234 of 2020: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 382, 482 Cr.P.C r/w 14A of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 praying, to cancel the interim order (unnumbered) granting interim bail to the First Respondent/Accused dated 23rd May 2020 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, herein in Crime No.214 of 2020 on the file of Assistant Commissioner of Police, CCB-I Police Station, Chennai.)

Common Order

1. The petitioner/accused in Crime No.119 of 2020 for offences under Section 3(1)(u) and 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) filed Crl.O.P.No.7929 of 2020 seeking direction to the learned Principle Sessions Judge, Chennai to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day after his surrender in Crime No.119 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent. Crl.M.P.No.4010/2020 is filed to amend the Crime number as 214 of 2020 in the cause title of Criminal original petition for the reason that the investigation of the case in Crime No.119 of 2020 has been transferred from the file of Inspector of Police, E3, Teynampet Police Station, Chennai -600 018 to the file of Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007 and renumbered as crime No.214 of 2020, which is allowed.

2. Crl.O.P.No.7930 of 2020 is filed against the order of the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai in granting interim bail to the respondent in Crl.M.P.No. Unnumbered/2020 dated 23.05.2020 and also filed Crl.M.P.No.4009 of 2020 to stay the grant of interim bail.    3. In the above Criminal Original petition, the de-facto complainant/second respondent filed intervening petition, counter and rejoinder. The first respondent/State has filed common counter.

4. Criminal Appeal No.234 of 2020 is filed by the de-facto complainant to cancel the interim bail granted by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai counter is filed by the first respondent/petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.7929 of 2020.

5. Since the issues involved in all these Criminal Original Petitions are common and pertains to Crime No.214/2020, they are taken up together and disposed of by a common order.

6. The F.I.R. in this case came to be registered on 12.03.2020 by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Teynampet, E3 Teynampet Police Station for the offences stated above. The informant in this case is the head of Athithamilar Makkal Katchi from 2016. He has been working to help the people who are from the downtrodden SC/ST and also to do the development in their Education and to strength their mutate by helping them improve their day to day life style. On 15.02.2020 an event viz., ‘Kalaignar Vasagar Vattaram’ was organised. In the said function Mr.R.S.Bharathi Member of Rajya Sabha and Mr.Dayanadhi Maran Member of Lok Sabha addressed the audience of more than 100 numbers, consisting of DMK party member, media and general public. The accused belongs to DMK party and is well known leader and has made disrespectful remarks on members of oppressed class stating that the appointment of Hon’ble Justice A.Varadharajan, who belongs to lower caste and other 7 or 8 appointments of lower caste judges to High Court were alms rendered by form

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top