SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 700

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.M. SUNDRESH, R. HEMALATHA, JJ.
Amal Peterson – Appellant
Versus
The Authorized Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Tirunelveli & Another – Respondent
W.P. No. 7611 of 2020 & W.M.P. Nos. 8934 to 8936 of 2020
Decided on : 18-08-2020

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :A.V. Arun, Advocate.
For the Respondents:P. Sugumaran, V. Chandrasekaran, Standing Counsel, AR.L. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for M/s. AL. Ganthimathi, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the promisor is entitled to seek reciprocal performances from the promisee after the period of impossibility expires, and the question of payment of compensation does not arise when there is no element of failure on the promisor's part.

Headnote:

Frustration of Contract - Sale of Property - Section 39, Section 54, Section 55, Section 56 - The court discussed the legal provisions of Section 39, Section 54, Section 55, and Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and their interpretations in the context of the sale of a property. The court held that the promisor is entitled to seek reciprocal performances from the promisee after the period of impossibility expires, and the question of payment of compensation does not arise when there is no element of failure on the promisor's part. The court also emphasized that the provisions should be read in unison, and the promisor is entitled to seek for refund and extension of time after the period of impossibility. The court permitted the respondents to go on with a fresh e-auction and allowed the petitioner to deposit the remaining amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order to the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner participated in an auction for the sale of a property but failed to pay the remaining amount within the stipulated period due to the pandemic situation. The petitioner sought an extension of time for payment, while the respondents refused further extension, leading to the filing of a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner is entitled to a refund and extension of time after the period of impossibility, and permitted the respondents to go on with a fresh e-auction. The court also allowed the petitioner to deposit the remaining amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order to the respondents.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to an extension of time for payment of the remaining amount due to the pandemic situation and the legal implications of the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, in the context of the sale of the property.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the promisor is entitled to seek reciprocal performances from the promisee after the period of impossibility expires, and the question of payment of compensation does not arise when there is no element of failure on the promisor's part. The court also emphasized that the provisions should be read in unison, and the promisor is entitled to seek for refund and extension of time after the period of impossibility.

Final Decision: The court permitted the respondents to go on with a fresh e-auction and allowed the petitioner to deposit the remaining amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order to the respondents.

JUDGMENT :

M.M. Sundresh, J.

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the communication e mail dated 02.05.2020 sent by the Branch Head, Alangulam Branch, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Pvt. Ltd., the second respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to extend the period for payment of balance amount by 45 days for the sale of the item 2 of the property under sale notice dated 13.01.2020 issued by the first respondent.)

1. In Periyar Pathai, Puliyur Village, Choolaimedu, Egmore, Nungambakkam (TK), Chennai, a land with an extent of 2400 sq ft., situated at old T.S.No.127 and 129, New T.S.No.129/4 pt was brought up for auction by the respondents on 03.02.2020 with the reserve price of Rs.1,50,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Fifty Lakhs only). The petitioner took part in the auction held on 03.02.2020 offering to bid for a sum of Rs.1,70,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Seventy Lakhs only). The following is the relevant terms and conditions governing the parties:-

    “5. The successful bidder shall deposit the balance seventy five percent (75%) of the bid amount within 15 days of the sale or such extended period as agreed upon in writing by the Authorized Officer/Secured Creditor at his discretion. In case of any default in depositing the amount within the stipulated period, the deposit will be forfeited as per sub Rule (5) of Rule (9) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 and the property shall be resold and the defaulting purchaser will forfeit all his/her claims to the property or to any part of the sum for which it may be subsequently sold.”

1.1 Accordingly, the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.42,50,000/- (Rupees Forty Two Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) being the one-fourth of the bid amount on 06.02.2020 followed by sale confirmation letter issued by the respondents. In furtherance of the sale, he made further payment of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs only) on 16.03.2020 and Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) on 18.03.2020 and Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) on 21.03.2020. Thus, the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.96,50,000/- (Rupees Ninety Six Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only).

1.2 However, the petitioner did not pay the remaining amount within the maximum period of ninety days allowed. Accordingly, on 29.04.2020, the second respondent asked the petitioner to remit the remaining amount on or before 03.05.2020 failing which the one-fourth of the amount already paid shall stand forfeited. The relevant paragraphs of the said communication are appositely referred hereunder:-

    “You have paid Rs.42,50,000(25% of bid amount) on 06.02.2020 and we have issued sale confirmation letter. Subsequently, you have paid an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- on 16.03.2020, Rs.10,00,000/- on 18.03.2020 and Rs.4,00,000/- on 21.03.2020.

Further, please note as per Sub- Rule(4) of Rule 9 of security interest rules – The balance amount of purchase price payable shall be paid by the purchaser to the authorized officer on or before the fifteenth days of confirmation of sale of the immovable property.

Sub-Rule (5) of Rule 9 of security interest rules – in default of payment within the period mentioned in sub-rule (4), the deposit shall be forfeited to the secured creditor and the property shall be resold and the defaulting purchaser shall forfeit all claim to the property or to any part of the sum for which it may be subsequently sold.

Even though we have granted maximum period of three months time as per the rule (ie up to 03.05.2020) you have failed to remit the remaining amount till date. Therefore you are requested to pay the remaining bid amount of Rs.73,50,000/- on or before -03.05.2020. Otherwise the 25% of the bid amount already paid by you shall be forfeited as per the above said rules of the Act and the property will be resold and you have no claim over the property or to any part of the sum or which it may be subsequently sold.”

                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                      1
                      2
                      3
                      4
                      5
                      6
                      7
                      8
                      9
                      10
                      11
                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                      supreme today icon
                      logo-black

                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                      Please visit our Training & Support
                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                      qr

                      Scan Me!

                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                      whatsapp-icon Back to top