SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 773

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.P. Sahi, Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, JJ.
Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Rep. by its Chairman B. Ramachandran & Others – Appellants
Versus
Medical Council of India, Rep. by Secretary, Sector VIII, New Delhi & Others – Respondents
W.A. Nos. 494 & 500 of 2020
Decided On : 13-08-2020

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :AR.L. Sundaresan, N.L. Rajah, Senior Counsels for M/s. Hari Radhakrishnan, J. Abishek, Advocates.
For the Respondent:V.P. Raman, N. Mala, Addl. Govt. Pleader (Pondy), M. Ravi, Advocates.

Headnote:(A) Medical Council of India Regulations - Clause 5(7) - Admissions to MBBS course - Institution improperly admitted four students after last stage of counselling, violating the regulations, leading to a directive for compensation - Court found that unilateral admissions contravened law, and ordered the students' admission void. (Paras 2, 58, 72)

(B) Appeal - Dismissal - Appellants' claim of acting in good faith rejected, with emphasis placed on necessity of adhering to regulatory framework. (Paras 70, 74)

Facts of the case:
The appeals arise from a decision denying the legality of admissions made by a medical institution to four candidates who were not on the official merit list. The institution claimed that no candidates showed interest from the provided list, which was disputed by the regulatory bodies. The original ruling mandated that the institution compensate the students.

Findings of Court:
The appeals were dismissed with findings that the institution acted beyond its authority in admitting students. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to established counselling procedures as mandated by law.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the institution had the authority to admit students outside the sanctioned list of candidates after prescribed counselling phases had concluded.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that admissions made unilaterally by the institution were invalid and emphasized that institutions must comply strictly with regulations regarding admissions, particularly the established procedure for filling vacancies.

Result: Appeals dismissed, with directions for the institution to compensate the students.

Table of Content
1. validity of admissions in mbbs course (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. procedure for admissions must be followed (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 23 , 27)
3. importance of government authority in admission (Para 9 , 10 , 18 , 22)
4. authority of colleges over admissions (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 34)
5. consequences of illegal admissions (Para 72 , 73 , 75)

JUDGMENT :

A.P. Sahi, J.

(Prayer: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the LETTERS PATENT against the order dated 11.03.2020 passed in W.P.No.15095 of 2019.)

1. Disputing the correctness of the judgment dated 11.03.2020 by a learned Single Judge, the present appeals have been filed by the petitioner/appellant Institution and by two other students seeking leave to appeal in a matter relating to admissions against four seats of MBBS course to the four candidates who were admitted by the appellant Institution on the ground that they remained vacant even after the last stage of counselling conducted by the Centralized Admission Committee (CENTAC), Government of Puducherry. The appellant Institution is a privately managed Medical College governed by the provisions of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and other relevant laws in this regard.

2. The learned Single Judge held that the appellant Institution, in violation of Clause 5(7) of the MCI Regulations, has unilaterally admitted these four students, which is in direct conflict with law and the judgments of the Apex Court governing the field. A compensation of Rs.1.00 lakh to each of the four students has also been directed to be paid by the appellant Institution with a further observation that the official respondents may explore the possibility of accommodating them in any other Institution in the coming academic year based on their merit.

3. Writ Appeal No.494 of 2020 has been filed by the original petitioner Institution. The writ petition giving rise to the said appeal is W.P.No.15095 of 2029, where the relief sought is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Government of Puducherry, through its Health Secretary and the Centralized Admission Committee, represented by its Coordinator (Admission), Government of Puducherry, to approve the admission of four candidates admitted by the Institution viz., (i) Bollini Damu V., (ii) Mahesh M.R.S., (iii) Sabari Ganesh P. and (iv) Shri Preethi M. in the MBBS course offered by the Institution for the academic year 2018-2019.

4. Writ Appeal No.500 of 2020 has been filed by two of the aforesaid candidates viz., Mahesh M.R.S. and Shri Preethi M. in their individual capacity, who were not parties to the writ petition, but were granted leave to appeal vide order dated 18.06.2020, whereafter the said appeal has been entertained.

5. The other two students viz., Bollini Damu V. and Sabari Ganesh, P., whose admissions are sought to be protected by the Institution have neither been impleaded in either of the proceedings nor they have filed their separate appeal questioning the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge.

6. A counter-affidavit was filed in the writ petition by the Medical Council of India; the Government of Puducherry and the Centralized Admission Committee as well as by the Pondicherry University to whom the responsibility of verifying the documents and certificates as well as the eligibility conditions is entrusted in the process of admission.

7. Shri AR.L.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel has advanced his submissions in W.A.No.494 of 2020; Shri N.L.Rajah, learned Senior Counsel has advanced in submissions in W.A.No.500 of 2020; Ms.Mala, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) has advanced her submissions on behalf of the Government of Puducherry, Centralized Admission Committee; Shri M.Ravi for Pondicherry University and Shri V.P.Raman has been heard for the Medical Council of India. Learned counsel have also filed their typed set of papers in these appeals. Written sub

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top