Sakthivel vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Mad) 889

T.RAJA, B.PUGALENDHI
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :R. Alagumani, Advocate.
For the Respondent: K.K. Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

B. Pugalendhi, J.

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records connected to the judgment in S.C.No.157 of 2015 on the file of the 4th Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli, dated 18.01.2016 and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant.)

1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the appellant/accused as against the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in S.C.No.157 of 2015, dated 18.01.2016. The appellant was charged for the offence under Sections 342, 302, 294(b), 307 & 506(ii) IPC. The trial Court, in conclusion of the trial, though acquitted him for the offence under Sections 342 & 294(b) IPC, has found him guilty, convicted and sentenced him as under:

Section of Law	Punishment imposed
302 IPC	To undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months.
307 IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Mad) 889

T.RAJA, B.PUGALENDHISakthivel – AppellantVersusState rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

T.RAJA, B.PUGALENDHI
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyam Police Station – Respondent