SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.P.SAHI, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JJ.
Kamala Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India rep. By its Secretary to Ministry of Corporate Affairs – Respondent
Writ Petition No.1538 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.1814 and 1816 of 2020
Decided on : 14-02-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Sricharan Rangarajan
For the respondents: Mr.R.Durga Rani,CGSC

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 226, 14, 21 and 300 A – Companies Act, 2013 – Section 124 (6) – Praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration – Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration to declare Section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and corresponding Rules 6 & 7 of the Investor Education and Protection Authority Fund (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016, as unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India – instant writ petition challenges the vires of Section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 6 and 7 of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016 as unconstitutional being violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India – Held, Position of law that, is that it is open for the courts to quash/strike down legislation on the grounds that it is manifestly arbitrary – In order to prove that a legislation is manifestly arbitrary, the burden is therefore to show that legislature has done something capriciously, irrationally and/or without adequate determining principle or if something is done which is excessive and disproportionate – In the facts of the present case however we do not find that the impugned provisions are “manifestly arbitrary – There is an awoved purpose for bringing this peice of legislation – It has been enacted to ensure that a company does not unjustifiably and unduly enrich themselves, as the depositors have failed to stake claim and have not been paid for a period of seven years from the date the amount became due – Court do not see any reason to hold that the said provisions are unconstitutional or they violate Article 14 or any other provisions of the Constitution – It cannot be said that the aforesaid provisions are faulty and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution – Writ petition is dismissed.

ORDER :

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration to declare Section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and corresponding Rules 6 & 7 of the Investor Education and Protection Authority Fund (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016, as unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India.

The instant writ petition challenges the vires of Section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 6 and 7 of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016 as unconstitutional being violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India.

2. The petitioner states that her son R.Murali Srinivasan passed away on 30/8/1993 intestate at Quriyat, Oman, leaving behind the petitioner and his wife. The petitioner's son was having shares in a Company called I-Flex Solutions Limited (IFLEX). The said Company was taken over by M/s. Oracle Financial Services Software Limited, fourth respondent herein. These shares were allotted to the petitioner in the year 1992.

3. Over the years, bonus shares were issued and the petitioner was holding 3200 shares. The market value of the share as on date would be about 1.14 crores. It is also stated that after the petitioner's son passed away, the dividends which were not received and as on date, unclaimed dividends worth Rs.29,92,000/-. It is stated by the petitioner that Section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, which deals with unclaimed dividends provides that all the shares in respect of which dividends have not been claimed for seven consecutive years or more than shall be transferred by the Company in the name of Investor Education and Protection Fund along with a statement containing such details as may be prescribed. Proviso to sub-Section 6 of Section 124 states that claimant of the shares shall be entitled to claim the transfer of shares from the Investor Education and Protection Fund in accordance with such procedure and on submission of such documents as may be prescribed.

4. Section 124 of the Companies Act, 2013, reads as under:-

"124. Unpaid Dividend Account.—

(1) Where a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid or claimed within thirty days from the date of the declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, the company shall, within seven days from the date of expiry of the said period of thirty days, transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid or unclaimed to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf in any scheduled bank to be called the Unpaid Dividend Account.

(2) The company shall, within a period of ninety days of making any transfer of an amount under sub-section (1) to the Unpaid Dividend Account, prepare a statement containing the names, their last known addresses and the unpaid dividend to be paid to each person and place it on the website of the company, if any, and also on any other website approved by the Central Government for this purpose, in such form, manner and other particulars as may be prescribed.

(3) If any default is made in transferring the total amount referred to in sub-section (1) or any part thereof to the Unpaid Dividend Account of the company, it shall pay, from the date of such default, interest on so much of the amount as has not been transferred to the said account, at the rate of twelve per cent per annum and the interest accruing on such amount shall ensure to the benefit of the members of the company in proportion to the amount remaining unpaid to them.

(4) Any person claiming to be entitled to any money transferred under sub-section (1) to the Unpaid Dividend Account of the company may apply to the company for payment of the money claimed.

(5) Any money transferred to the Unpaid Dividend Account of a company in pursuance of this section which remains unpaid or unclaimed for a period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top