S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
V. G. Santhosam – Appellant
Versus
Shanthi Gnanasekaran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The lis on hand arose in result of the orders passed by the sole Arbitrator on 02.11.2019 in M.A.No.4 of 2019. The sole Arbitrator passed orders, impleading the first respondent Mrs.Shanthi Gnanasekaran to participate in the adjudicative process in Arbitration Claim Nos.1, 3, 2 and 4 of 2019. Challenging the said impleadments, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed both on factual and on legal grounds.
2. THE COMMON FACTS IN BRIEF:
The appellants state that the partnership firm M/s.V.G.P. Beach Housing was originally formed on 27.03.1979 by and between late Mr.V.G.Panneerdas, Mr.V.G.Santhosam, Mr.V.G.Selvaraj, Mr.V.G.P.Ravidas and Mr.V.G.P.Rajadas. On 16.12.1982, the partnership firm was reconstituted with the induction of two new partners, namely, Mr.V.G.P.Babudas and Mr.V.G.S.Rajesh and thereby every partner was entitled to 1/7th of the net profits in accordance with the Clause 9 of the Partnership Deed dated 16.12.1982.
3. The abovesaid Partnership Deed states that upon the death of one of the partners, the nominees of the deceased partner would be entitled to absolute rights of that partner. Therefore, upon Mr.V.G.Panneerdas's death on 07.05.1988, his nominee (and wif
Chloro Controls India (P) Ltd. vs. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
Cheran Properties Ltd vs. Kasturi & Sons Ltd [(2018) 16 SCC 413]
Indowind Energy Ltd. vs. Wescare (India) Ltd.
Shree Ram Mills Ltd. vs. Utility Premises (P) Ltd. [(2007) 4 SCC 599]
S.N. Prasad vs. Monnet Finance Ltd.
SBP & Co. vs. Patel Engg. Ltd. [(2005) 8 SCC 618]
Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd. vs. Jayesh H. Pandya [(2003) 5 SCC 531]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.