IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, R. THARANI, JJ.
S.M.K. Balakrishnan and Others – Appellants
Versus
The Union of India and Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD) No. 3663 of 2019, W.M.P. (MD) No. 2865 of 2019
Decided On : 18-11-2019
Forest Act, 1980 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 - Section 26 - Wild Life Act, 1972 - Articles 47, 48-A and 51-A (g) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Environment Protection - Creating public awareness - Restriction on de-reservation of forests - It is stated that land in question is a grassland used by residents of Village from time immemorial and it provides ecosystem with clean water prevents floods and also serves a grassing ground for cattle – Further grassland is an important habitat for several species of flora and fauna including migratory birds - Area has unique biodiversity with several endemic and rare plants - Through grassland river flows which is irrigation source of around Acres of cultivable lands and it is stated to be only water source to residents of village - It is stated that when entire area is so unique in its biodiversity Fisheries Department without giving importance to protection of environment and ecosystem have proposed to establish a massive fish hatchery unit in grassland at Village – Held, Court do not seriously doubt stand taken by Fisheries Department that they will not use any chemicals while rearing fish seeds - Nevertheless rearing of fish seeds requires water and feed which may be organic but definitely can have an impact if water is drained to nearby areas – But Fisheries Department states that they will draw water from bore wells - They propose to extract ground water which is already in depleted stage in Hills - Only reason which appears to have assumed predominant to locate fish farm in subject land is climatic condition - In Court considered view this cannot be sole reason as Court are required to balance environment and industry - Technology has developed where temperature controlled environment is being created to rear rare varieties of plants and herbs and they have also been done on large scale basis – Therefore merely because Hills has a cool climate it cannot be a justification to state that fish seed farm should be located in land in question – Court are of clear view that project as proposed by Fisheries Department has to be necessarily shelved - That apart as Court have observed that proceedings of District Collector transferring a portion of land to Fisheries Department having been done without examining far-reaching consequence has to be necessarily held to be unsustainable and Court are inclined to set aside same - Petition allowed
ORDER :
1. The petitioners five in number have filed this writ petition as a public interest litigation to forbear the Director of Fisheries/fifth respondent from establishing Aqua Culture Center, in the land comprised in Survey No. 967, measuring an extent of 86.93.00 Hectares, at Mannavanur Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District.
2. The petitioners are the residents of Kavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District and stated to have been involved in creating public awareness, propagating the various welfare schemes evolved by the Government and also rendering assistance to the villagers whenever required.
3. It is stated that the land in question is a grassland used by the residents of the Village from time immemorial and it provides the ecosystem with clean water; prevents floods and also serves a grassing ground for cattle. Further, the grassland is an important habitat for several species of flora and fauna, including migratory birds. The area has unique biodiversity with several endemic and rare plants. Through the grassland, Thalavarai river flows, which is the irrigation source of around 2000 Acres of cultivable lands and it is stated to be the only water source to the residents of the village. It is stated that when the entire area is so unique in its biodiversity, the Fisheries Department, without giving importance to the protection of environment and ecosystem, have proposed to establish a massive fish hatchery unit in the grassland at Mannavanur Village.
4. It is further stated that if a fish hatchery or Aqua Culture Center is established in the said grassland, it would result in serious environmental degradation and the waste, which would be generated from the fish points, would result in contamination of the water resource and ultimately, destroy the entire grassland area. Therefore, the petitioners seek for a direction from this Court to forbear the Fisheries Department from establishing the Aqua Culture Centre in the subject land.
5. Mr. T. Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, after elaborately describing about how the entire area in and around Mannavanur Village is an ecologically sensitive area, submitted that there is a duty cast upon the Department to protect the grasslands and establishing Aqua Culture Center in the ecologically sensitive area is against the public interest.
6. Referring to the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court, in the case of T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India and Others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995, it is submitted that the areas, which are having the characteristics of forests and identified as deemed forests, irrespective of the ownership, require permission under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (in short “the Act”) for putting them to use for non-forest activities.
7. Further, by referring to the decision of the Honourable Full Bench of this Court in the case of T.K. Shanmugam vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2015 (6) CTC 369, it is submitted that the Court had deprecated the practice of destruction of water bodies and stressed the importance of protection and preservation of the water bodies.
8. Further, it is submitted that the Honourable Supreme Court, in the case of S. Jagannath vs. Union of India and Others, (1997) 2 SCC 87, has pointed out that the agricultural lands, salt pan lands, mangroves, wet lands, forest lands, land for village common purpose and the land meant for public purposes shall not be used/converted for construction of shrimp culture ponds.
9. It is further submitted that in terms of Section 2 of the Act, there is a restriction on the de-reservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose.
10. Referring to the notification issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India, dated 29.01.2018, it is submitted that the Central Government had listed the activities, which constitute violation of provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder and issued guidel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.