A. Aswin vs Secretary to Government of Puducherry, Health & Family Welfare Service Department, New Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1713

N.ANAND VENKATESH
A. Aswin – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government of Puducherry, Health & Family Welfare Service Department, New Delhi – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
B. Balavijayan, V.B.R. Menon, G. Ethirajulu, ARL. Sundaresan, Sr. counsel, M/s. AL. Ganthimathi, N.S. Nandakumar, V. Karthic, Sr. Cousnel, L. Swaminathan C.T. Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader, V.P. Raman Standing Counsel, Rabu Manohar, R. Gopinathan, Standing Counsel, L. Swaminathan, Sriram Panchu, Senior Counsel, V. Chandra Prabu, K. Kumareshbabu, T.V. Lakshmanan, A. Jenasenan, Bajanairaja, A.V. Ramalingam, Additional Government Pleader, M. Ravi, Standing Counsel, S. Prakash, Arunkumar, C.V. Ramachandra Murthy, T.V. Krishnamachari, T. Gowthaman, Advocates.

Table of Content
1. background of writ petitions and issues (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. common counselling and centac procedures (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. issues regarding admissions and candidate placements (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. judicial consideration of admissions and fees (Para 15 , 16)
5. response from institutions and legal justifications (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. court's observations on admission procedures (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. emphasis on merit in medical education (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
8. shortcomings in admission practices (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
9. conclusion on the legality of admissions (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. decisions on discharge orders by mci (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
11. final observations on admissions (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. proposal for costs due to unilateral admissions (Para 46 , 47)
13. dismissal of writ petitions (Para 50 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer in W.P.No.31921/2017: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to immediately discharge all the illegall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Mad) 1713

N.ANAND VENKATESHA. Aswin – AppellantVersusSecretary to Government of Puducherry, Health & Family Welfare Service Department, New Delhi – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

N.ANAND VENKATESH
A. Aswin – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government of Puducherry, Health & Family Welfare Service Department, New Delhi – Respondent