SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 539

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. SATHYANARAYANAN, B. PUGALENDHI, JJ.
The Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court & Others - Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram Madurai & Others - Respondent
W.P.(MD)Nos. 20903 of 2016, 23452, 24495, 17370 & 18035 of 2019
Decided On : 12-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
M.Murugesan, Narmadasampath, Additional Advocate General, Assisted by Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, Special Government Pleader, I.Pinaygash, M.Gururaj, A.Thiyagarajan, Government Advocate, Veera Kathiravan, Senior Counsel, C.Jeganathan, D.Venkatesh, Advocates.

Any quarry operations shall be permitted only by way of lease agreement, as per Article 299 (I) of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

SAVUDU QUARRYING - SAND QUARRYING - ILLEGAL QUARRYING - ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE - MINING PLAN - LEASE AGREEMENT - MINERAL CONSERVATION RULES - DIRECTIONS ISSUED.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitions were filed as Public Interest Litigations on the ground that there are illegal and rampant sand quarry activities taking place under the guise of savudu quarries.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the savudu quarries were permitted without any lease agreement, without any mining plan and without any environmental clearance. The Department did not take any steps to identify by subjecting the mineral for examination with any lab to ascertain the contents/components of the mineral.

Issues: 1. Whether the savudu quarries were permitted without following the relevant Acts and Rules? 2. Whether the grant of quarry lease without ascertaining the composition/component of the minerals and without obtaining a report from a authorised lab is valid?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the savudu quarries are permitted without following the relevant Acts and Rules and therefore, all these permits were granted for Savudu without any lease agreement, without ascertaining the composition of the mineral, without mining plan and without environmental clearance, are against relevant provisions of law.

Final Decision: The court issued directions to the government to take necessary steps to prevent illegal quarrying of sand and to ensure that all quarry operations are carried out in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT :

B. Pugalendhi, J.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to prevent the illegal quarrying of Sand in Elanthaikootam Village and other surrounding villages and consequential direction to seize the equipment used for illegal and indiscriminate quarrying and transporting the sand.

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos.4 to 7, from issuing permission order for taking savudu and gravel soil at Thoothukudi District as per G.O.Ms.No.50 (Industries MMC.1) Department), dated 27.04.2017 without conducting scientific and technical research of the soil and consequently directing the respondents to take appropriate steps to desilt 53 tanks and channels as per the list provided in the typed set of papers coming under the Srivaikundam Anicut, Thoothukudi District by considering the representation, dated 28.08.2018.

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take necessary actions over the representation of the petitioner dated 09.08.2019 and regularise the desilting of water bodies by curbing illegal quarrying of soil by virtue of permissions issued under Section 12(2)(b) of Tamil Nadu Minor Minerals Concessions Rules, 1959.

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent through his proceedings in M2/290/2019, dated 21.10.2019.

These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigations on the ground that there are illegal and rampant sand quarry activities taking place under the guise of savudu quarries. Since the issue in all these writ petitions revolves around the sand / savudu sand quarries, these writ petitions have been tagged together, taken up for hearing and disposed of by way of this common order.

2. The writ petition in W.P(MD)No.20903 of 2016 was originally filed by one Nagendiran of Siddharkottai, Ramanathapuram Taluk and District stating that his village is situated 800 metres away from the East Coast, there are large number of sand deposits in his village and in the adjacent villages, namely, Jameendaar Valasi, Elanthiakoottam, Elanthaikoottam Yadav Kudiyiruppu, Tamilarvadi, Samathuvapuram, Sitharkottai, Vaalur, Mudiveeranpattinam, Poosari Nagar and Nethaji Nagar. The private respondents shown in the writ petition are said to have been quarrying those sand deposits with the help of the official respondents, as savudu quarries.

3. In this writ petition, when the matter has been taken up for hearing on 03.11.2016, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram submitted a report, dated 01.11.2016, wherein it is stated that the private respondent / 5th respondent has obtained savudu lease, but he has violated all the terms and conditions of the lease granted and removed savudu sand, more than the permitted quantity and therefore, they have contemplated action as per Rule 36 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 [Hereinafter shall be referred to as TNMMCR,1959]. The Photographs filed by the petitioner before this Court would disclose that this quarry must be a sand quarry and not otherwise. Though the respondents claimed action has been contemplated, there is no reference as to the penalty imposed.

4. The writ petition in W.P(MD)No.17370 of 2019 has been filed contending that without scientific and technical study of soil / earth, permissions have been given to desilt 53 tanks and channels in Srivaikundam Anicut, Thoothukudi District and in that process unauthorised and illegal quarrying of sand is taking place and the excavated sand is sold for commercial purposes. It is further stated that the Industries (MMC.1) Department, vide G.O(MS)No.50, dated 27.04.2017 made certain amendment

                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                            1
                            2
                            3
                            4
                            5
                            6
                            7
                            8
                            9
                            10
                            11
                            Judicial Analysis

                            AI

                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                            supreme today icon
                            logo-black

                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                            Please visit our Training & Support
                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                            qr

                            Scan Me!

                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                            whatsapp-icon Back to top