T.S.SIVAGNANAM, R.N.MANJULA
G. Chakrapani – Appellant
Versus
Jayapal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.N. MANJULA, J.
1. The above Civil Revision Petition placed before us under the orders of the Hon’ble Chief Justice pursuant to the orders of reference made by K.Raviraja Pandian.J (as he then was) dated 27.01.2003 in view of the same set of facts Sampath.J in S.A.No.912/1987 made an order for reference dated 01.07.1999, but the said reference not decided and remain inconclusive.
The question of law made in this Civil Revision Petition is
Whether a decree passed by a Civil Court in respect of properties alleged to be Kudiyiruppu, is a nullity or whether the Civil Court has prima facie jurisdiction to pass a decree under the Kudiyiruppu Act?
2. The point of reference made by Sampath.J in S.A.No.912/1987 in the order of reference 01.07.1999 was as to Whether the Civil Courts have got jurisdiction under the Tamil Nadu Rural Artisans (Conferment of Ownership of Kudiyiruppu) Act, 1976, when the authorities under the said Act, seized of the matter in Second Appeal No.912 of 1987. The Division Bench before whom the reference made in S.A.No.912/1987 was placed under the order of the then Hon’ble Chief Justice, had observed that the question of reference would not arise to the facts
Ganesan Vs. Madurai Achari reported in 1979 92 LW 91
Thangavelu Naickar Vs. Muthukumara Chettiar reported in 1979 92 LW 678
Kalyanasundaram Udayar Vs. Pazhaniayya Udayar 1982 95 LW 562
Ganesan v. Madurai Achari (1978) 91 L.W. 6
Esakki Vs. Subramania Aiyer (1998 2 CTC 141
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Ramalinga Samigal Madam reported in 1985 4 SCC 10
Vanathan MuthuRaja Vs Ramalingam 1997 (6) SCC 143
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.