JUDGMENT :

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

Prayer: Appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the impugned/interim order dated 23.11.2019 passed by Sole Arbitrator, Mr. S. Samuel, Advocate at Chennai, in Application No. 1 of 2019 in Arbitration Case Nos. ACP No. HLF-FLY Nos. 3/2019, 4/2019, 5/2019, 1/2019, 2/2019, 20/2019, 19/2019, 21/2019, 26/2019, 10/2019, 6/2019, 13/2019, 18/2019, 27/2019, 9/2019, 7/2019, 16/2019, 23/2019, 14/2019, 28/2019, 11/2019, 25/2019, 17/2019, 8/2019, 12/2019, 15/2019, 22/2019 and 24/2019 respectively.

1. These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed challenging the interim Orders passed by the learned arbitrator to seize the vehicles.

2. Since, the dispute is said to have been arisen in hire purchase agreements, in respect of around 28 trucks, entered between the parties on 30.09.2017 and the fact that in all the appeals, similar disputes have arisen out of the hire purchase agreements, though styled as a different contract, as the matter involves one and same and similar to each other, this Court is inclined to d