SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 872

Annakkili – Appellant
Versus
Murugan – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: For the Appellant:N. Suresh, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, K. Gangadaran, Advocate, R2, No appearance.

Judgment :-

(Prayer: Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 5.4.2019 made in A.S.No.17 of 2017 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Villupuram, confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.7.2017 made in E.A.No.387 of 2013 in E.P.No.132 of 2010 in O.S.No.226 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tirukoilur.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

2. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Villupuram in A.S.No.17 of 2017 dated 5.4.2019, dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant and confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Tirukoilur in E.A.No.387 of 2013 in E.P.No.132 of 2010 in O.S.No.226 of 2009 dated 20.7.2017, raising the following substantial questions of law:-

“(i) Whether the Courts below have committed manifest error in dismissing the claim petition insofar as item No.1 is concerned as there was no attachment on 8.10.2009 when the property was sold by the second resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top