R.SURESH KUMAR
Ashok Leyland Employees Union Foundry Division, Represented by its President, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Muthukumarasamy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code and Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to review the order made in W.P.No.16924 of 2020 dated 08.01.2020.)
1. This Review Application has been filed to review the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16924 of 2020, dated 08.12.2020.
2. Before dealing with the grounds raised in this review application, the facts in nutshell which are required to be noticed as projected in the writ petition are as follows:
(i) that the first respondent herein who was the employee of the third respondent herein and member of the second respondent herein Union had filed the aforesaid writ petition in W.P.No.16924 of 2020, seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent therein, i.e., the second respondent herein to consider the representation of him, dated 14.10.2020 and to see that the election schedule to the petitioner union is issued forthwith and election is conducted within a time frame.
(ii) On considering the prima facie case projected by the writ petitioner, notice was ordered in the said writ petition to all the respondents.
(iii) Since the employees union who was the second respondent in the wr
North Eastern Railway Employees Union v. III Additional District Judge, Farukhabad
Ideal Jawa Employees Association v. Umesh and Ors.
H.M.T.Karmika Sangha v. Commissioner of Labour reported in 1985 ILR(Kar) 411
Praga Tools Corporation Vs. Shri C.A.Imanual reported in (1969) 1 SCC 585
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.