SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 2079

NANDITA DUBEY
MONA BAI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
SANJIV KUMAR JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for Appearing Parties
Shri Pradeep Sahu, for the Appellant

ORDER

Shri Pradeep Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner.

1. This petition takes exception to the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by the Court of 23rd Civil Judge, Class-1, Jabalpur, whereby the application filed by the present petitioner/defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed.

2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant is that the sale deed dated 18.05.1999 was in the knowledge of the plaintiff as in a suit filed earlier by his wife the said fact has been mentioned. The trial Court after considering the averments made in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC and reply filed by the plaintiff to the said application rejected the application on the ground that the documents produced by the defendant along with the application can be a matter of defence, however, the same cannot be considered at the stage of deciding the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant has placed reliance on a decision passed by the Apex Court in the case of Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs. Ram Prasanna Singh (dead) by LRs, Civil Appeal No.2960/2019, whereby the Hon'ble Court has reiterated the principles laid down in the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top