KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Deenadayalan – Appellant
Versus
N. Sathish Kumar Rep. by his General Power of Attorney N. Ashok Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
1. S.A. No. 1022 of 2019 has been filed by the 4th defendant/Auction Purchaser in the suit challenging the common judgment and decree dated 11.04.2018 made in A.S. No. 5 of 2017 on the file of the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
2. The plaintiff in the suit has filed the Cross Appeal No. 54 of 2020 in S.A. No. 1022 of 2019 challenging the common judgment and decree dated 11.04.2018 made in A.S. No. 5 of 2017 on the file of the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris, in restricting the suit claim of the plaintiff to 2/3rd and in modifying the judgment and decree dated 09.11.2016 made in O.S. No. 35 of 2010 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Udhagamandalam.
3. S.A. No. 1055 of 2019 has been filed by the 4th defendant challenging the common judgment and decree dated 11.04.2018 made in the Cross Appeal No. 5 of 2017 on the file of the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
4. S.A. Nos. 160 and 161 of 2021 has been filed by the 5th defendant in the suit challenging the common judgment and decree dated 11.04.2018 made in Cross Appeal No. 5 of 2017 and in A.S. No. 5 of 2017 on the file of the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
5.
Malini Srinivasan vs. Canara Bank
R. Janakiraman vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI/SPE, Madras
State of Haryana vs. Narvir Singh
Subramaniam S.V. vs. Cypress Semiconductor Technology India Pvt. Ltd. 2008 (1) CTC 471
United Bank of India vs. Lekharam Sonaram and Co. AIR 1965 SC 1591
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.