IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Rajendran - Appellant
Versus
State rep by The Inspector of Police, Ambalur Police Station, Vellore District - Respondent
Crl.A.No.12 of 2012
Decided On : 08-03-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Committed Suicide - Cruelty - Appeal against Conviction - Benefit of Doubt - Appellant married the victim / deceased as second wife since his first wife did not bear any child out of marriage. Victim / deceased after marriage gave birth to a female child and later she was driven out of matrimonial home and thereafter a family panchayat was convened and victim deceased returned back to matrimonial home. Victim / deceased had administered medicine i.e. gripe water to her child and since she had not properly administered medicine, appellant had chided her saying; and slapped her and left home and after that deceased self immolated herself by pouring kerosene - Held, As per evidence of P.W.5, mother of victim / deceased, victim / deceased and appellant are stated to have come to her house and that they were having a cordial relationship. Further nowhere in evidence it has been stated that petitioner had mensrea in respect of suicide of his wife. Act of the husband chiding the wife for not administering medicine properly to child, at no stretch of imagination can be taken as an act of abetting suicide. As stated above there is no evidence that appellant had intention and requisite mensrea to abet suicide. Looking from all angles, this Court comes to an irresistible conclusion that prosecution has not proved its case beyond all reasonable doubts and appellant cannot held liable for commission of offence u/s.306 I.P.C - Criminal appeal allowed
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 14.12.2011 made in S.C.No.106 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C, Tirupattur, Vellore District finding the accused guilty for the offence under Section 306 IPC and convicting and sentencing him to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows :-
The victim / deceased / Gomathi is the second wife of the appellant/A1 and A2 / Saraswathi (since acquitted) is the first wife of A1. PW1 / Chandra is a neighbour and relative of the victim / deceased/Gomathi. PW3, PW4 and PW5 are respectively the elder sister, father and mother of the victim / deceased/Gomathi. The appellant got married to the victim / deceased during the year 2002 and after the marriage, the matrimonial home was set up at the house of the appellant at Chinnamottur village. The appellant married the victim / deceased as second wife since his first wife did not bear any child out of the marriage. The victim / deceased after the marriage gave birth to a female child and later she was driven out of matrimonial home and thereafter a family panchayat was convened and the victim deceased returned back to the matrimonial home. The further case of the prosecution is that on 26.07.2005 at 3.00 pm the victim / deceased had administered medicine i.e. gripe water to her child and since she had not properly administered the medicine, the appellant had chided her saying “FHe;ijia fhy; ePl;of; bfhz;L kUe;J Cw;wf;Tlhjh” ; and slapped her and left home and after that at about 5.00 p.m the deceased self immolated herself by pouring kerosene. P.W.10 and P.W.13 who were neighbours rushed to the house of the victim / deceased and took her to Government Hospital, Vaniyampadi. On the same day, P.W.14/Sub Inspector of Police attached to Ambalur Police Station received the intimation from Vaniambadi Town Police Station that the victim / deceased was admitted in Government Hospital at Vaniyambadi and had gone there at 19.30 hours. P,W.14 recorded a statement from the deceased, which became the complaint (Ex.P11) in which P.W.3 / sister of the deceased had signed / attested and P.W.11/ the duty Doctor had also attested that the victim / deceased was concious at the time of giving the statement. The signature of P.W.3 in the statement is Ex.P1, and the attestation made by the Doctor /P.W.11 is Ex.P7. P.W.14 who came to the police station after recording the statement of the deceased registered the FIR in Crime No.328 of 2005 for the offence under Section 309 I.P.C and sent the same to the Court and thereafter proceeded with further investigation. The FIR is Ex.P12. Thereafter at 21.30 hours, P.W.14 went to the place of occurrence and prepared rough sketch / Ex.P13 and observation mahazar/Ex.P3 in the presence of P.W.6 and P.W.7. Further, P.W.14 also recorded the further statement of the deceased under Section 161 Cr.P.C and also examined the witnesses P.W.1, P.W.13, P.W.8, P.W.10, P.W.5, P.W.2, P.W.3, P.W.6 and P.W.7. The statement of the deceased is Ex.P14.
3.On 26.07.2005 at 8.10 p.m., P.W.15 / District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi received the intimation from the hospital to record the dying declaration from the deceased admitted in the hospital at 8.25 p.m. P.W.15 reached the hospital and recorded the dying declaration from the deceased in the presence of duty doctor/P.W.11. The duty doctor/P.W.11 issued certificate Ex.P8 that the deceased was in conscious state of mind. The dying declaration recorded by P.W.15/ the Judicial Magistrate is Ex.P16.
4. On 27.07.2005, P.W.14 received the death intimation Ex.P10 that Gomathi died on 27.07.2005 at 1.00am and then at 6.00am he received the complaint Ex.P2 from P.W.4 / father of the victim /deceased and then altered the F.I.R in Crime No.328 of 2005 from the offence u
Amol Singhv. State of M.P. (2008) 5 SCC 468 : (2008) 2 SCC (Cri) 637
Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi Vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP
Bapu v. State of Maharashtra (2006) 12 SCC 73 : (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 545
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2009) 16 SCC 605 : (2009) 11 Scale 24
Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana
S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan
State of W.B. v. Orilal Jaiswal (1994) 1 SCC 73 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 107
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001) 9 SCC 618 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 1088
Mahendra Singh v. State of M.P. 1995 Supp (3) SCC 731 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 1157
Gangula Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2010) 1 SCC 750
Sampat Babso Kale and another v. State of Maharashtra reported in (2019) 4 SCC 739
Kamla v. State of Punjab (1993) 1 SCC 1 : 1993 SCC (Cri) 1 : AIR 1993 SC 374
Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan (2000) 1 SCC 310 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 182 : AIR 1999 SC 3062
Lella Srinivasa Rao v. State of A.P. (2004) 9 SCC 713 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1479 : AIR 2004 SC 1720
State of A.P. v. P. Khaja Hussain (2009) 15 SCC 120 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 380
Sharda v. State of Rajasthan (2010) 2 SCC 85 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 980 : AIR 2010 SC 408
Sanjay v. State of Maharashtra (2007) 9 SCC 148 : (2007) 3 SCC (Cri) 91
Heeralal v. State of M.P. (2009) 12 SCC 671 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 686
State of U.P. v. Madan Mohan (1989) 3 SCC 390 : 1989 SCC (Cri) 585
Nanhau Ram v. State of M.P. 1988 Supp SCC 152 : 1988 SCC (Cri) 342
Surajdeo Ojha v. State of Bihar 1980 Supp SCC 769 : 1979 SCC(Cri) 519
State of Maharashtra v. Krishnamurti Laxmipati Naidu 1980 Supp SCC 455 : 1981 SCC (Cri) 364
Ram Manorath v. State of U.P. (1981) 2 SCC 654 : 1981 SCC (Cri) 581
Kake Singh v. State of M.P. 1981 Supp SCC 25 : 1981 SCC (Cri) 645
Rasheed Beg v. State of M.P.(1974) 4 SCC 264 : 1974 SCC (Cri) 426 : AIR 1974 SC 332
K. Ramachandra Reddy v. Public Prosecutor (1976) 3 SCC 618 : 1976 SCC (Cri) 473 : AIR 1976 SC 1994
Munnu Raja v. State of M.P. (1976) 3 SCC 104 : 1976 SCC (Cri) 376
State of U.P. v. Ram Sagar Yadav (1985) 1 SCC 552 : 1985 SCC (Cri) 127 : AIR 1985 SC 416
Ramawati Devi v. State of Bihar (1983) 1 SCC 211 : 1983 SCC (Cri) 169
Paniben v. State of Gujarat (1992) 2 SCC 474 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 403 : (1992) 2 SCR 197
Muthu Kutty v. State (2005) 9 SCC 113 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 1202
Ravi v. State of T.N. (2004) 10 SCC 776 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 576
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 22 : 1958 Cri LJ 106 : 1958 SCR 552
Harbans Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1962 SC 439 : (1962) 1 Cri LJ 479 : 1962 Supp (1) SCR 104
Gopalsingh v. State of M.P. (1972) 3 SCC 268 : 1972 SCC (Cri) 513
State of U.P. v. Ram Sagar Yadav (1985) 1 SCC 552 : 1985 SCC (Cri) 127 : AIR 1985 SC 416
Gangula Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2010) 1 SCC 750
Prempal V. State of Haryana reported in (2014) 10 SCC 336
Sampat Babso Kale and another v. State of Maharashtra reported in (2019) 4 SCC 739
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.