IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
P.N. PRAKASH, J.
S.M. Balaji and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State and Ors. – Respondent
Crl. O.P. Nos. 26924, 28725 of 2018, Crl. M.P. Nos. 15540 and 16774 of 2018
Decided On : 28-09-2020
Information Technology Act, 2008 - Section 66-A - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 500 and 507 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 156(3) - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 65-B - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Suspected e-mail ID: mfssurgeons@gmail.com - Fraud - Doctor -de facto complainant and (A2) are Dental Surgeons having specialised in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - They both are members of Indian Society for Dental Research and International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons - There was an international conference of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons at Barcelona, in which, Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant) and other surgeons from India presented a scientific paper on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Whether there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused - Held, This is far more dangerous than printing and circulating scandalizing materials. By using medium of e-mail, thousands of persons can be reached in one stroke all over the world and the reputation of a person can be marred - Coming to facts of this case, final report and accompanying documents are sufficient enough to take cognizance of offences and issue process to Jeyapragash (A1) and Dr. Balaji (A2) - Therefore, in opinion of this Court, there are sufficient materials against Jeyapragash (A1) and Dr. Balaji (A2) to be prosecuted for the said offences, justifying order of issue of process by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai - Criminal original petitions are dismissed.
ORDER :
P.N. Prakash, J.
1. This case was taken up through video conferencing.
2. For the sake of convenience, the dramatist personae in this case will be referred to by their names.
3. Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant) and Dr. S.M. Balaji (A2) are Dental Surgeons having specialised in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. They both are members of the Indian Society for Dental Research and International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. There was an international conference of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons at Barcelona, Spain, on 21st October 2013, in which, Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant) and other surgeons from India presented a scientific paper on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. On return from Barcelona, one Dr. Kishore Nayak, a friend of Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant), forwarded an e-mail that was received by him from the e-mail ID: mfssurgeons@gmail.com with derogatory contents against Dr. Kishore Nayak, Dr. George Paul and Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant). It may not be necessary to set out the entire contents in this order, but, it would suffice, if some excerpts are extracted:
4. Apart from the above, the e-mail is replete with insinuations and allegations of fraud. Therefore, Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant) gave a complaint dated 01.11.2013, based on which, the police registered an FIR in Crime No. 30 of 2014 on 11.01.2014, for the offences under Sections 500 and 507 IPC and Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (for short "the IT Act"), against "suspected e-mail ID: mfssurgeons@gmail.com".
5. The investigation of the case was taken over by Anbazhagan, Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime. During the course of investigation, it came to light that, on account of personal rivalry between Dr. Balaji (A2) and Dr. Gunaseelan (de facto complainant), a false e-mail ID in the name of mfssurgeons@gmail.com was created by Jayaprakash (A1), an employee of Balaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, Chennai, run by Dr. Balaji (A2) and the impugned e-mail was sent to all the Dental Surgeons through out the world. Jayaprakash (A1) was arrested by the police and Dr. Balaji (A2) was released on anticipatory bail.
6. After completing the investigation, Anbazhagan, Investigating Officer, filed a final report dated 02.06.2015 before the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, for the offences under Sections 506(I) and 507 IPC and Section 66-D of the IT Act, against Jayaprakash (A1) and Dr. Balaji (A2).
7. At this juncture, it may be apposite to extract a few paragraphs from the final report:
There was a previous enmity between the 2nd accused and the complainant and other maxillofacial surgeons, the 2nd accused has ins
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.