IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, N. SESHASAYEE, G.R. SWAMINATHAN, JJ.
S. Sasikumar - Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. - Respondents
W.A. Nos. 2295 to 2308, 2325 to 2327, 2330 to 2333, 2350 to 2352, 2354 to 2365, 2367, 2373 to 2376, 2433, 2452 to 2460, 2466, 2467, 2472, 2473 and 2481 to 2483 of 2018
Decided On : 19-01-2021
Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Markets (Regulation of Location) Act, 1996 - Sections 21, 47 , 45 and 21(8) - Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 9-A , 2(13) , 2(13) 56 and 57(4) - Seeking direction for removal of shops put up by wholesale flower merchants in Badrian street - Ground of violation of principles of natural justice - Whether the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Markets (Regulation of Location) Act, in particular, Section 21 authorise authorities - Market Committee to lock and seal premises which are otherwise in lawful occupation of the appellants and dispossess the persons who are otherwise in lawful occupation thereof for contravention of the provisions of Act - Whether determination of the factual question is as to whether appellants are carrying on wholesale trade is left to domain of the Market Committee or it should be preceded by a criminal prosecution as contemplated under Section 47 of the Act - Whether what is being carried on in Badrian street is retail business or wholesale business - Whether the said Act enables the authority to lock and seal is certainly a question of law - Whether notice carries on wholesale trade or not - whether the authority can lock and seal the premises and dispossess the persons concerned - Whether the local authority has the power to determine - Whether a person is engaged in wholesale trade or retail trade - Whether an individual is carrying on business in retail trade or wholesale trade - whether the factual determination has to be preceded by a criminal prosecution under Section 47 of Act - whether the notice is engaged in wholesale trade or not - Trade in various commodities was carried on. Badrian Street was known for wholesale trade in flowers - Jurisdictional police station is known as Flower Bazaar Police Station. With rapid growth of population and commercial activities, place became crowded leading to traffic congestion and gave rise to host of civic issues. Therefore, the Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Markets (Regulation of Location) Act, 1996 was enacted to deal with the situation not only in Chennai but also in other parts of Tamil Nadu - number of wholesale merchants shifted to Koyambedu Market Complex, there were many who continued to do wholesale business in flowers in Badrian street - Led to institution of number of proceedings by both the parties - matter was eventually dealt with by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A. - Division Bench by order held that if a person is engaged in retail trade – Held, affected individual is ready to mend his ways and agrees to confine himself to retail trading or if he proposes to shift his trade to non-specified commodities, then the local authority cannot continue to keep the premises under lock and seal - It is possible that in some cases, the trader is only a tenant sealing of the premises, he might abandon the trade altogether. If the premises remains under lock & seal indefinitely, it is only landlord who would suffer irreparable hardship - No statutory power can be construed in absolute terms. The doctrine of proportionality will have to be read into statutory scheme - Tamil Nadu Act 24 of 1996 authorise local authority as defined in Section 2(5) of the Act 24 of 1996 and not the market committee to lock and seal the premises for contravention of the provisions of the Act – Ordered Accordingly
ORDER :
G.R. Swaminathan, J.
1. A Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.11.2018 made in W.A. No. 2295 of 2018 etc., referred the following questions for determination by a Larger Bench:
(ii) Whether the determination of the factual question is as to whether the appellants are carrying on wholesale trade is left to the domain of the Market Committee or it should be preceded by a criminal prosecution as contemplated under Section 47 of the Act?"
Pursuant to the order of reference, the Hon'ble Chief Justice constituted this Full Bench for answering the same.
What led to the reference?
2. In George Town area in Chennai, wholesale trade in various commodities was carried on. Badrian Street was known for wholesale trade in flowers. Even the jurisdictional police station is known as Flower Bazaar Police Station. With rapid growth of population and commercial activities, the place became crowded leading to traffic congestion and gave rise to host of civic issues. Therefore, the Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Markets (Regulation of Location) Act, 1996 (Tamil Nadu Act 24 of 1996) (hereinafter called as "the Act") was enacted to deal with the situation not only in Chennai but also in other parts of Tamil Nadu. Vide G.O (Ms) No. 523, Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 17.12.1996, the Government of Tamil Nadu notified Koymbedu Market Complex as the wholesale market area. George town which includes Badrian street became out of bounds for wholesale business in perishable items such as flowers. Though a number of wholesale merchants shifted to Koyambedu Market Complex, there were many who continued to do wholesale business in flowers in Badrian street. This led to institution of number of proceedings by both the parties. At the instance of the wholesale traders in flowers based at Koyambedu, the Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai initiated action in the year 2002, Earlier, they had filed WP No. 9633 of 1999 before the Madras High Court seeking direction for removal of shops put up by wholesale flower merchants in Badrian street. The matter was eventually dealt with by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A. No. 1990 of 2001. The Division Bench by order dated 04.10.2001 held that if a person is engaged in retail trade, he can continue to do so in George town area. But one cannot engage in wholesale trade in specified commodities such as flowers outside the Koyambedu market complex. If they did, action can be taken. Pursuant to the direction from the Hon'ble Division Bench, the Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai issued proceedings dated 18.01.2002 rejecting the request of Badrian street traders to continue to sell perishable items at Badrian street.
3. The said order was set aside in WP No. 1272 of 2002 on 14.11.2003 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. The Commissioner of Chennai Corporation was directed to hold enquiry and give a specific finding as to whether what is being carried on in Badrian street is retail business or wholesale business. The Koyambedu wholesalers filed WP No. 26053 of 2004 for directing the authorities to stop the wholesale trade in perishable goods in Chennai Metropolitan Area except in Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex. The said writ petition was disposed of by directing the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (hereinafter called as "CMDA") to consider the representation made by the Koyambedu wholesalers. Thereupon, the Member-Secretary, CMDA issued order dated 07.10.2004 directing the Badrian street traders to stop wholesale trade in perishable items and shift to
Kamalammal and Others v. Venkatalakshmi Ammal and Others
Bidi, Bidi Leaves and Tobacco Merchants' Association v. State of Bombay
The authority to lock and seal premises under the Tamil Nadu Act is exclusive to local authorities, not market committees.
The power to manage and sell public market properties lies with the designated authority, dismissing claims of exclusive rights by vendors under market regulation statutes.
The main legal point established is the discretion of the authorities in considering license renewals and the necessity of prior notification for shifting market areas under the West Bengal Agricultu....
The Government can exempt provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Markets Act when justified by public interest, maintaining market regulation objectives.
There is no law prohibiting a building complex owner from letting out the building without adhering to the provisions of the Act, 1994.
Traders conducting private business in government-regulated markets are required to obtain municipal licenses, distinguishing regulatory control from ownership.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.