SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 1733

P.T.ASHA
Kesava Goundar – Appellant
Versus
Jayalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Natarajan.
For the Respondent: L. Prabakar.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC against the Judgement and Decree dated 14.06.2016 made in A.S.No.98 of 2009 by the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram, confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 11.11.2008 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Ulundurpet, in O.S.No.117 of 2006.)

1. This Second Appeal is filed challenging the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, in A.S. No. 98 of 2009, in and by which the learned Judge had confirmed the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Munsif, Ulundurpet, in O.S. No. 117 of 2006. The facts which are considered necessary to dispose of the above Second Appeal is alluded to herein below. The parties to the lis are referred to in the same rank as before the Trial Court.

2. The plaintiff had filed the suit O.S.No.117 of 2006, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Ulundurpet, seeking the relief of a declaration and recovery of possession from the 1st defendant and for damages. She had come to the Court contending that the suit property belonged absolu

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top