A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Thirupathi – Appellant
Versus
State by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perur Sub-Division, Perur All Women Police Station, Coimbatore – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Code Procedure, to set aside the judgment of conviction passed in Sessions Case No.137 of 2014 dated 28.2.2019 on the file of the Mahalir Neethi Mandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore and allowing the Appeal throughout by acquitting the Appellants.)
1. Challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the Mahalir Neethi Mandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore in Sessions Case No.137 of 2014 dated 28.2.2019, the present Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused.
2. The case of the prosecution, as evinced from the prosecution witnesses and the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant is as under:-
Vipin Jaiswal vs. State of Andhra Pradesh ((2013) 3 SCC 684)
Appasaheb and another vs. State of Maharashtra ((2007) 9 SCC 721)
Union of India v. Garware Nylons Ltd. [(1996) 10 SCC 413 : AIR 1996 SC 3509]
Chemical and Fibres of India Ltd. v. Union of India [(1997) 2 SCC 664 : AIR 1997 SC 558]
Jatinder Kumar vs. State of Haryana ((2020) 16 SCC 721)
Upon considering Appasaheb [Appasaheb v. State of Maharashtra
Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.